Programmable Inertia Generators!

[MarkE]

LOL, so it's off into the bushes you go without offering support for your claim of eliminating inertia.

[gravityblock]

LOL, Newton's First Law tells us that it does not require any force to maintain constant velocity of an object that has any value of inertia.  So that behavior does not distinguish whether or not an object has inertia.  So, kindly answer my question.

LOL, so it's off into the bushes you go without offering support for your claim of eliminating inertia.

There is no inertia at a constant velocity.  Newton's first law is called the "law of inertia".  So, if it doesn't require a force to maintain constant velocity of an object, then it's because there are no resistant forces acting on the body, including inertia itself.  However, if the object had inertia at a constant velocity, then the inertia of the object would resist it's motion and decrease the object's velocity, which would then require a force to maintain a constant velocity which would then make Newton's first law contradictory.  In other-words, this behavior most certainty does distinguish whether or not an object has inertia or not.

Gravock

[MarkE]

There is no inertia at a constant velocity.  Newton's first law is called the "law of inertia".  So, if it doesn't require a force to maintain constant velocity of an object, then it's because there are no resistant forces acting on the body, including inertia itself.  However, if the object had inertia at a constant velocity, then the inertia of the object would resist it's motion and decrease the object's velocity, which would then require a force to maintain a constant velocity which would then make Newton's first law contradictory.  In other-words, this behavior most certainty does distinguish whether or not an object has inertia or not.

Gravock

LOL, make up all the junk claims that you want.  I suppose it helps when you invent your own definitions for well-established terms.  The property of inertia is such that it requires force to accelerate an object of non-zero mass.  Zero acceleration means zero force, not zero inertia.  You fail again.

[gravityblock]

LOL, make up all the junk claims that you want.  I suppose it helps when you invent your own definitions for well-established terms.  The property of inertia is such that it requires force to accelerate an object of non-zero mass.  Zero acceleration means zero force, not zero inertia.  You fail again.

Below is the definition for the well-established term of inertia in quotes (this definition is not of my own invention as you falsely asserted):

"Inertia is the resistance of any physical object to any change in its state of motion, including changes to its speed and direction or the state of rest".

An object that has constant velocity doesn't have any change in its state of motion, thus it has no resistance or inertia, and there is no force required for it to remain at that constant velocity per Newton's first law.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

The property of inertia is such that it requires force to accelerate an object of non-zero mass.  Zero acceleration means zero force, not zero inertia.  You fail again.

Yes, it does take a force to accelerate an object of non-zero mass because an object resists any changes in it's motion, which is known as inertia.  However, we're not talking about accelerating an object are we.  We're talking about a constant velocity with no changes in it's motion, in case you haven't noticed, and I have showed how the experiment achieves a constant velocity, and you have refused to say which portions you disagreed with along with an explanation for that disagreement.  It is you who is consistently failing, and not me.

Gravock