Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

Started by e2matrix, August 29, 2015, 09:01:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: gravityblock on August 29, 2015, 10:31:34 PM
Below is a quote as found on Adgex's website on the Adgex accumulator.  It appears they're tapping into the Schumann resonance frequencies of the earth.

Gravock

And that's what makes me think it's a scam, because _as you  know_ very low frequencies generally require very large structures for efficient transmission/reception. The wavelengths of the Schumann resonance frequencies are very long indeed.

QuoteToday Schumann resonances are recorded at many separate research stations around the world. The sensors used to measure Schumann resonances typically consist of two horizontal magnetic inductive coils for measuring the north-south and east-west components of the magnetic field, and a vertical electric dipole antenna for measuring the vertical component of the electric field. A typical passband of the instruments is 3–100 Hz. The Schumann resonance electric field amplitude (~300 microvolts per meter) is much smaller than the static fair-weather electric field (~150 V/m) in the atmosphere. Similarly, the amplitude of the Schumann resonance magnetic field (~1 picotesla) is many orders of magnitude smaller than the Earth's magnetic field (~30–50 microteslas).[21] Specialized receivers and antennas are needed to detect and record Schumann resonances. The electric component is commonly measured with a ball antenna, suggested by Ogawa et al., in 1966,[22] connected to a high-impedance amplifier. The magnetic induction coils typically consist of tens- to hundreds-of-thousands of turns of wire wound around a core of very high magnetic permeability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances

If they are really picking up significant energy from the SR in a handheld flashlight-sized object.... they are doing something very scientifically significant and important. So where are the peer-reviewed papers?

(Also note the mention of neutrinos in their literature.... red flags all around that bit.)

e2matrix

Subharmonics?   Or very fine gauge very high wind coils?    Why does the mention of Neutrino's make it suspicious?  I've been hearing about Neutrino's for a couple decades.    http://www.ps.uci.edu/~superk/neutrino.html   Do we really understand Neutrino's yet? 

Jimboot

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 30, 2015, 02:33:31 PM
And that's what makes me think it's a scam, because _as you  know_ very low frequencies generally require very large structures for efficient transmission/reception. The wavelengths of the Schumann resonance frequencies are very long indeed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances

If they are really picking up significant energy from the SR in a handheld flashlight-sized object.... they are doing something very scientifically significant and important. So where are the peer-reviewed papers?

(Also note the mention of neutrinos in their literature.... red flags all around that bit.)


They are an unlisted Australian public company. Just read their investor pres from a year ago. My reading of suggests they were going to back door list by acquiring a small mining stock. This is not uncommon here, however it looks like that didn't happen. Still find it odd they would choose Australia to setup in. May have to buy one of those torches and send it to one of you brainiacs.




The other thing that is unusual is there is no 70+ Aussie white male on their board. Unlikely to get institutional investors without out imho

gravityblock

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 30, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
60 lumens per watt? Some LEDs are much more efficient than that.

If you were paying attention, then you would have noticed at the bottom of the image it says, "* the pre-defined luminous efficacy are the typical/average values", for that particular light source selected.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

TinselKoala

Quote from: gravityblock on August 30, 2015, 07:53:27 PM
If you were paying attention, then you would have noticed at the bottom of the image it says, "* the pre-defined luminous efficacy are the typical/average values", for that particular light source selected.

Gravock

For certain (obsolete) values of "typical/average".
If you were building a "free energy" flashlight, would you select an inefficient LED? If you were paying attention, you might have read the LED data sheet I attached to my post. Those LEDs cost about 65 cents US singly and a lot less when ordered in quantity.