World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

[txt]

I found another paper, explaining the voltage recovery during the relaxation period better than the one I posted above, and in greater details. This time it is the full version, not only an abstract. If you do not want to read the entire paper, look at the Fig.2 and read the couple of paragraphs above it. I am attaching also a link of the standalone diagram below the link of the PDF. It shows the voltage recovery after the load is removed. The top diagram is for initially fully charged battery; the bottom one if for a depleted battery. The ideal recovery time at Li-ion batteries is around 2 hours (that comes from another paper)

http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slyp086/slyp086.pdf

http://m.eet.com/media/1053387/TI_Algorithms_Fig2.gif

[markdansie]

1st testrun:

16.02.16	18:30:00	26000
	18:40:00	28800
	18:50:00	28700
	19:00:00	29000
	19:10:00	28900
	19:20:00	28800
	19:30:00	28700
	19:40:00	28600
	19:50:00	28200
	20:00:00	27500
	20:10:00	26200
	20:20:00	24200
	20:30:00	20000
	20:40:00	11400

At 20:40 i switched it off because light intensity was falling rapidly.

Thanks for Sharing the results
I expect you will get a good bounce back but progressively shorter running times after each test. I am running a similar test with 3 aa nimh batteries driving three leds
Mark

[skywatcher]

Update:

16.02.16    18:30:00    26000
    18:40:00    28800
    18:50:00    28700
    19:00:00    29000
    19:10:00    28900
    19:20:00    28800
    19:30:00    28700
    19:40:00    28600
    19:50:00    28200
    20:00:00    27500
    20:10:00    26200
    20:20:00    24200
    20:30:00    20000
    20:40:00    11400
       
17.02.16    18:30:00    13800
    18:35:00    10000
    18:40:00    5100

No significant recharging. 

I still have the contact problems, and the lamp was in a horizontal position so maybe the accus were not properly in contact with each otherduring the recharging time (maybe this is necessary for recharging ?) so i will give it another try by putting the lamp in an upright position until tomorrow so that the accus are pressed together by their own weight.

Visually the lamp still emits enough light to appear quite bright.
This shows that it is not possible to 'measure' light intensity visually, with the human eye, or with a normal video camera.
To do tests, it's absolutely necessary to *measure* the light output with a light sensor.

[txt]

Looks good, and consistent with the theory. The shaking noise you hear is typical for the ELFE battery - all users report it, but it does not seem to harm anything. My theory is that it must be the Schumann resonances that you hear there. Finally the aluminium body is the best amplifier known to man, and works for frequencies from 3Hz to 5GHz or more, so it certainly amplifies any shaking noise too!

[txt]

Regarding the insufficient contact - if there was no contact between the batteries when laying horizontally, the flashlight would not light, or would be blinking. It does not seem to be the case with your tests, as far as I understood.

... and BTW, Mr. Ivchenko of ADGEX has clearly shown that the batteries "recharge" when the switch is turned off, so it is clear that they do not need any closed circuit to "recharge", and hence any contact problems could not influence the "recharging"