Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tinman's coil shorting circuit

Started by penno64, September 12, 2015, 05:18:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Vortex1

Dear Gyula

I am in agreement with your thoughts in your last post. The schematics you and penno64 offered look viable and are somewhat similar to what I posted elsewhere. In light of the new info of the second coil, I am working on a few new schematics which I will post when I am satisfied that they seem reasonable.

Another thing to ponder is Brad's use of the words BTDC and ATDC. These are terms used for IC engines to denote timing, but how do they apply to a universal motor when each small angular advancement of the rotor to a new commutator contact represents a new reset of conditions, unlike an IC engine?

As an example, a rotor with six poles would achieve magnetic TDC every 60 degrees of rotation, while an IC engine achieves mechanical TDC every 360 degrees of shaft rotation.


It would be better to speak of a timing diagram based on degrees of rotation, unless the terms "Before top dead center" and "after top dead center" can be made meaningful to us.

If the terms BTDC and ATDC refer somehow to one complete revolution of the shaft as in an IC engine, then how  is the timing alignment point to be understood with respect to the stators and rotor?

Kind regards, Vortex1 / ION

poynt99

I'm pretty sure he means this:

BTDC=before top dead center
ATDC=after top dead center

"TDC" being when the magnet and armature are in alignment.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

gotoluc

I also understand it like poynt has posted above but would explain TDC as below.

"TDC" would be where each rotor core section locks to the stator magnet.

Luc

Vortex1

Just wanted to clear that issue up, I also agree that TDC is when the rotor flux for a given rotor segment is in complete alignment with the stator flux.

This occurs X times per one shaft revolution, x being the number of rotor poles (or commutator segments).

Thanks for your input guys. We are on the same page so now it's back to getting the timing for the shorting transistor and the actual shorting circuit.

I'll attempt a few schematics that might address what was meant by "shorting" i.e did Brad mean "connecting " one coil to another at a specific time (with an FET) or did he mean providing a low resistance path (FET) for the induced voltage in one or both coils at a specific time.

With only one FET switch as seen in the videos, it could get tricky.

Here is a first cut schematic which just shorts the "second coil" to stator B coil.

I straightened out some of the "tangle" to make the schematic more readable from an electronic schematic conventional viewpoint.

gyulasun

Hi Vortex1,

Thanks for the schematic, looks good to me.  This version connects the second winding in parallel with stator coil B   i.e. I would say the second coil quasi shorts stator coil B because I assume the second coil has less L inductance in practice than stator coil B (winding space for the second coil is limited).  Nevertheless the 'short' does not represent a really low impedence like a MOSFET's on channel would insure for instance but this may not be a drawback.
Of course, some protection means are to be provided for the gate-source electrodes of the MOSFET to limit any control voltage within +/- 20V (spec for most MOSFETs including the IRF540 Brad used),  though these means are not needed to include in the first cut schematic.  8)

Gyula