Tinman's coil shorting circuit

[citfta]

Hi artv,

The armature rotating is changing the field to some extent as the brushes are continually making contact with a different set of segments and therefore a different set of coils.  There is probably some transformer action going on between the windings but I think most of the current coming from the stator windings is because the armature coils moving past the stator coils are acting like a generator.  I am in the process of looking for a universal motor so I can do some more testing of this idea myself.  I am pretty sure there is more to this than what I am aware of.

If you have a universal motor to work with try shorting one stator coil and drawing power from the other one.  The shorted one should cause the armature to have more torque and more stable speed and thus allow you to draw more power from the second stator coil.  This is only a guess on my part so I could be pretty wrong about this idea.

Carroll

[massive]

seychelles diagram is the same as a fly back transformer , the secondary is open so no opposition to the primary . 
a motor / generator being a rotating transformer , theres also the air gap like a FBT


S1270003a.jpg (83.01 kB, 450x800 - viewed 380 times.)

[seychelles]

massive the idea came to me on the 5 nov in a flash..yes u r correct it is the same as a flyback transformer.
the idea is to divide the back emf into segments hence may be reducing its effect..
it has not been tested by me yet i though some one out there will be eager.
i am back home but not allow to experiment in my own garage. dictator at home..
but i will succeed in inventing my free energy machine..i repeat this a thousand times everyday..
this circuit can be used in any circuit that requires the reduction of the back emf..so
i propose the the stator of  a washing machine motor..or the rotor..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdeKvp-AVuw

[shylo]

If you have a universal motor to work with try shorting one stator coil and drawing power from the other one.  The shorted one should cause the armature to have more torque and more stable speed and thus allow you to draw more power from the second stator coil.  This is only a guess on my part so I could be pretty wrong about this idea.
Hi Carroll, I gave that a try ,but it didn't make any difference.
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to have a magnet inserted in the core of the field winding ,maybe that's why?
One thing I did see was ,which I didn't know was possible, was that a voltage can be produced by spinning the armature with a drill , take the starts of the field coils connect them to the brushes and the ends of the coils is your output.
I was under the impression that there had to be a magnetic field present in order to produce voltage. Apparently I was wrong.
It was small 60 microvoltts, but I wonder if the fields were rewound with a much finer guage and more turns?
artv 

[shylo]

Wrong again, You don't even have to spin it.
I connected a cap bank to the ends of the field coils,(with a diode) and they are still charging (12hrs), slow but sure.
The only input is making the physical connections.
How do the caps charge? It's not recovery charge,(they were dead).
I do have a rotor ,with magnets on it close by, but it isn't turning.
How can spinning copper winds in the presence of stationary copper winds ,create a magnetic field without the magnets?
Or is the nearby field interacting with the coils?
artv

Sorry I spun it initially , but then realized ,it kept charging without it.