Was the moon landing for real ???

[hartiberlin]

Here are PDF files of Lunar rocks samples...


http://www-curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/compendium.cfm


But only because these are scientifically made must not mean
the rocks were really brought back by the Apollo astronauts...

[hartiberlin]

I always liked this poor smudge.

http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/cgi-bin/clementine/clib/multires.pl?clickres=5&ox=0&oy=0&res=0&size=768&latitude=-70&longitude=137&submit=Use+Lat%252FLong&sensor=UVVIS&filter=415_nm

Hmm,
that is a real interesting picture.

So that it is not deleted out of the NASA database I am copying it over here.

Here it is.
So what do they might have retouched  there ?
A building or a landed UFO ?

[hansvonlieven]

Amongst the rocks collected by the Apollo teams there were a number of specimens that had been gathered from the surface.

Perhaps, if you had a very large meteorite, you could split it and pass the core off as the real thing.

With a rock that has been lying on the surface for millions of years on an atmosphere lacking celestial body this becomes quite a different matter. The passage of time as well as the inevitable bombardment with micro particles leave their mark. Here on earth we do not get this as small particles burn up in the atmosphere before reaching the surface.

On the moon this is not so. These high energy collisions leave traces. It would be impossible to fake samples to such perfection as to fool a really good geologist.

No, I believe the samples are real, as to when and by whom they were collected I cannot say, I wasn't there.

Hans von Lieven

[devilzangel]

Who took this picture,
when the astronauts have already left the moon ?

Well, it must have been bugs bunny. ok kidding.

Seriously though, it could have been a left over camera which could have been remote controlled or timed to take an image and relay back via radio frequency. The quality doesnt seem too great, could be a cheaper camera.

Alot of stuff and equipment was left behind due to the size of the smaller top module as well as the weight it could jettison back into space.

Look to the right of the left over module; you see a shadow of another object left behind.

I would also have to say that image has had a severe loss in quality. Do you notice all the air burshing? For me, examining a close to near original source would allow for better judgement.

who knows, maybe it is the camera crew taking a last few shots from the UFO before leaving.

*****
About the airbrushed object sat image., with proper expertise, you might be able to see a fair amount of what is layered behind the airbrush; it was done as a transparency airbrush, allowing for a certain amount of see through.

If you look over the rest of that image, doesnt it look so strange to see close to 70% of the image kind of airburshed? wow, something big there. (big as in importance as well as size)

devilzangel
..

[Cap-Z-ro]

Whether the number is accurate or not, I've read this is the 3rd go round on this planet for human kind - supported by an article I once read, showing a stainless steel hammer which was reportedly found incased in rock millions of years old.

Regards