A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[jbignes5]

please look above your post for the proof that li-ion batteries have a lower power density of the li-ion caps.

Obviously you are not an experimenter and have nothing to bring to the table but your bible thumping. DO IT or shut up! Put up or get out of the kitchen. Build it, the burden of proof is on you not him. He made the claim and now it is your job to prove it with a real experiment, not some drivel you are harping on. The ball is in your court. It will be interesting if you could even be smart enough to figure out how he made it. Trust me it is all there in previous videos made by him.


Do it or face the consequences that you are nothing but a bible thumper and troll.


The reason why no one spotted a problem but you is because you are making a problem out of nothing. Thats why no one here spotted it either "chicken little". They all know about what he is doing because he has shown his work in many many videos. He has explained on more then 3 or so videos that his goal is to get people working in this area. Thats the main goal. When you have many many people working on a problem it gets many many new views of that same problem. Plus he wants people to do the work. To see that this stuff needn't be that complicated. It is you who is making this into something it is not. As a general comparison he attempts to show that it is better both in the materials that makes it and the environment which is getting heavily polluted with this kind of stuff. But i digress. Prove him wrong. Not by calculation but by a video made by you showing it isn't right with your scientific mathematical proofs done the way you like. Otherwise let it go. See a troll is exactly what you are doing and hence why you got deleted posts because you seem to think you can demand things from people. You say because he is ignoring you that he doesn't want to face this and that couldn't be further from the truth. He wants people to see that this stuff can be done easily and safely to encourage others to think and yes maybe prove him wrong. Not by mathematical BS but by example. Show your example and maybe he will forgive you and answer your demands. Thats all he wants. For you to do it if you think he is in error. Not by armchair watching a video but by doing the experiment to learn just how easy this is.


By the way how does it feel for someone to demean and demand you to produce evidence?


Come on smarty pants show us your skills of the real and not some mathematical construct you worship.

[MileHigh]

Obviously you are not an experimenter and have nothing to bring to the table but your bible thumping. DO IT or shut up! Put up or get out of the kitchen. Build it the burden of proof is on you not him. He made the claim and now it is your job to prove it with a real experiment, not some drivel you are harping on. The ball is in your court. It will be interesting if you could even be smart enough to figure out how he made it. Trust me it is all there in previous videos made by him.


Do it or face the consequences that you are nothing but a bible thumper and troll.

Listen to me.

To measure the energy in a battery you measure voltage times current times time.

RMS measuring the energy in his battery by incorrectly measuring current times time.

He is missing the voltage measurement which BY DEFINITION you CAN NOT ignore.

Let that sink into your head.

It is that bad, and that is not "bible thumping."   You have nothing, and the RMS clip should be taken down and redone.  He needs to make more accurate mass measurements for the active compounds and he needs to actually do the energy measurement properly.

Based on my very preliminary estimate, there is a decent chance that he does not have any advantage at all over a lithium-ion battery when it comes to energy per unit mass for the active compounds.

[MileHigh]

And by the way in all courts that I have known it isn't the burden of proof on the claimant it is the burden of proof on the accuser.

Wake up, this is science and the burden of proof is on the claimant.  That is the most tired cliche in the realm of free energy;  "Prove that my over unity device does not work."

[jbignes5]

please look above your post for the proof that li-ion batteries have a lower power density of the li-ion caps.

Obviously you are not an experimenter and have nothing to bring to the table but your bible thumping. DO IT or shut up! Put up or get out of the kitchen. Build it, the burden of proof is on you not him. He made the claim and now it is your job to prove it with a real experiment, not some drivel you are harping on. The ball is in your court. It will be interesting if you could even be smart enough to figure out how he made it. Trust me it is all there in previous videos made by him.


Do it or face the consequences that you are nothing but a bible thumper and troll.


The reason why no one spotted a problem but you is because you are making a problem out of nothing. Thats why no one here spotted it either "chicken little". They all know about what he is doing because he has shown his work in many many videos. He has explained on more then 3 or so videos that his goal is to get people working in this area. Thats the main goal. When you have many many people working on a problem it gets many many new views of that same problem. Plus he wants people to do the work. To see that this stuff needn't be that complicated. It is you who is making this into something it is not. As a general comparison he attempts to show that it is better both in the materials that makes it and the environment which is getting heavily polluted with this kind of stuff. But i digress. Prove him wrong. Not by calculation but by a video made by you showing it isn't right with your scientific mathematical proofs done the way you like. Otherwise let it go. See a troll is exactly what you are doing and hence why you got deleted posts because you seem to think you can demand things from people. You say because he is ignoring you that he doesn't want to face this and that couldn't be further from the truth. He wants people to see that this stuff can be done easily and safely to encourage others to think and yes maybe prove him wrong. Not by mathematical BS but by example. Show your example and maybe he will forgive you and answer your demands. Thats all he wants. For you to do it if you think he is in error. Not by armchair watching a video but by doing the experiment to learn just how easy this is.


By the way how does it feel for someone to demean and demand you to produce evidence?


Come on smarty pants show us your skills of the real and not some mathematical construct you worship.

Please answer this.. Answer all of this without skirting around the issue....

[jbignes5]

Wake up, this is science and the burden of proof is on the claimant.  That is the most tired cliche in the realm of free energy;  "Prove that my over unity device does not work."

In the first place he doesn't claim overunity so please stop making this what it isn't....

Ok so what is peer review to you?