A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[itsu]

Come on guys, grow up.

Allthough MH never will win a price for being the most diplomatic communicator, what he 99% of the time is putting down in the forums is sound.

I know it hurts when you are told in an unambiguous manner that your measurements or way of thinking is flawed, but MH almost always backs it up with
references and his knowledge he gained in his many years working in the industry.

Off course he can and will be wrong sometime, but sooner or later that will be straighten out by similar knowledgeable people who will point this out in a civiliged way.

Please take note of what he is saying and use it in your advantage instead of feeling attacked all the time.
 

Regards itsu

[tinman]

Brad:

You are FOS, 100%.  You are still in a state of shock because you have been given the real deal by me and it has therefore slanted what you say about me.  On the Joule Thief thread you almost went nuts because of it.

You can't deal with what I say above, and the ironic twist is when I first mentioned to you that RMS did something unbelievable you agreed with me - he discharged a capacitor and measured the current but did not measure the voltage to measure the so-called "energy" in the capacitor.   You agreed with me that that was ridiculous and went and posted on his YouTube clip to that effect.

I am no troll, and there is no such thing as the "Edison Electric car," by Edison Power and Sunvault Energy, it's preposterous nonsense.  You clearly don't know how to qualify a company, and I do.

http://www.sunvaultenergy.com/sunvault-energy-and-edison-power-company-to-build-electric-supercar/

My ass, it's total horseshit, just like what you are saying about me is total horseshit.

So you need to get over the chip on your shoulder and if this is your hobby, then work at it.  You have learned more about electronics in the past three months than you learned in the past six years and you damn well know it.  And I am one of the primary reasons for that happening.

MileHigh

MH,it dose not matter if your wrong or right,the way you go about things-it's like your on the hunt for another victim.
Everything you !think! you know,must not be argued against--we seen such in the JT thread.

For instance,the schematics below.
You say !your! JT circuit(1) is the most efficient,and i say circuit 2 is more efficient
I give you a very sound reason as to why circuit 2 is more efficient,and all you say is--crap,circuit 1 is more efficient--even though you have,on several occasions in other thread's,say including a battery in a circuit is a loss,when current from another source flows through that battery,and then to the load. The latest of this example,was your explanation on the 3 battery system Dave is sharing. But even when you are wrong,you insist you are right--and your latest on the IDEAL coil thread,where apparently now voltage leads current in charging a capacitance
Then there was your fiasco about the JFET,after i mentioned that it would be a good way to make a ultra low voltage JT-and the list go's on. Every thing i say,your right there to try and disprove it,whether you are wrong or right. You just jump straight onto everything i say,without giving any thought as to whether you are wrong or right--it's just the automatic !wrong! button pushed by you,and then you try and deal with your mistakes later on down the track,by some how turning into some one elses mistake

Others can say what they like about you,but most of us here are aware of the way your work.

I have given you the opportunity to back up your claim that you could out do me on a bench,and your knowledge is far greater than mine,and every time you back down,and we hear that famous call--I dont build

If all your knowledge on the way coils react and work is correct and spot on,and your circuit knowledge is far greater than mine,then take me on--a simple JT is well within anyone's means--stop being lazy,and back up your claim.



Brad

[MileHigh]

d3xOr:

Okay, I take it from your comments that you now agree that Robert Murray-Smith made an unacceptable mistake because he completely ignored the voltage when he was supposedly making an energy measurement.  Honestly, it's beyond belief but it is the case.  I will repeat to you again, I am no troll and you should retract your statement.

itsu:

Thank you for your comments.  For sure I am not perfect but with this RMS business I started out by trying to give him some sound advice and he rejected everything I said to him.  So I looked at a few more of his clips and simply stated to him that he was wrong.

Brad:

Get over it.  It turns out that you have been more or less deceiving yourself for years and I brought some reality into the picture for you.  You are benefiting from that, and the more you spin, the more you ultimately hurt yourself.

And you are still deceiving yourself.  The nonsensical "Edison electric car" does not exist but you won't acknowledge that.  Now you are saying "apparently now voltage leads current in charging a capacitance" with respect to me which is not what I said at all.  I said to you that when you charge a capacitor with a pulse then the concept of current leading or lagging voltage does not apply.  The fact that you would mention the bloody JFET for the 30th time is both sad and comical.  Stop deceiving yourself and others like some hapless spin doctor trapped in a vortex.

I am no troll and you should retract your statement.  I yanked you out of your electronics stupor and I saw Robert Murry-Smith doing something wrong and I had the conviction to state it.

MileHigh

[memoryman]

My 5 cents (inflation).
I also commented on RMS's video, similar to MH. RMS replied that he agreed but did not think it mattered. 
If you think that the message is less important than the way it is delivered, than you will lose out on a lot of good info.

[minnie]

   I too PM'd RMS and disappointingly he didn't seem to "get it" about the
  declining voltage.
   I really like the fellow and he's done some inspiring videos.
         John.