Mars terraforming with atomic bombs

[lumen]

Slow down the smaller moon and crash it into mars.
Mars mass would be closer to earth and likely contain a molten core from the impact.
Dust cloud would cause additional heating for many years.

Of course some debris could fly off and impact earth many years later, but one for all or none for all right!

[PIH123]

move the satellite of Mars Deimos in synchronous orbit.

Let's be totally 100 percent irrational and say it was possible to "just" move the moon to where you want it. 


How are you going to get around the fact that you need to add 6,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg or
6,400 Trillion Trillion tonnes of mass to the planet.
Without this, there can NEVER be enough gravity to hold the atmosphere to the surface.

I guess your next answer would be to crash Venus into it.
After all, if we can easily move a moon, then how hard can a planet be which is only 50 million or so miles away.


Franco, These are all very easily verified facts, if only you would bother to look them up
before posting your many fantasies.


.
.
.
.
.
Just saw that while I was typing, Lumen posted about crashing the moon to add the mass.

Sorry, but we would need a mass 50,000,000 (50 million) times the size of the larger moon.

[franco malgarini]

Instead of fighting destructive wars humanity has to conquer lofty ideals, such as the colonization of space ...

[PIH123]

Instead of fighting destructive wars humanity has to conquer lofty ideals, such as the colonization of space ...

Tell you what, I will jump up to Mars tonight carrying a few billion Nukes that I made in my garage this afternoon.
I will also take along 6,400 trillion trillion tonnes of rock in a backpack.

I won't need a spacesuit cause I will go SUPER fast and hold my breath.
Don't worry, I'll take along a bottle of water so I don't get dehydrated.

.
.
.
.
.
What ? You don't think I can physically do that ?
Are you saying there just isn't enough available energy / fuel on earth to transport 6,400 trillion trillion tonnes of rock in to space and on to Mars.
And that it would only leave 1/7 th the mass of the earth left over which would cause total atmospheric loss here.
And that I still wouldn't have begun to re-melt the core of mars which would be required for a magnetosphere critical to habitation.



Well, I guess your ideals are not lofty enough then and that you would prefer to be fighting destructive wars.
What an inside the box thinker.

Pete