Rotating Magnetic Field's and Inductors.

[woopy]

Hi Tinman and Verpies

Greatest thankyou for that page 18  (should be sticky somewhere) and probably the next ones.

Now we are touching right inside the heart of the thing.

Very helpfull.

Thank's for sharing

Laurent

[poynt99]

An observation from the two scope shots:

It appears that the reduced current during the ON time is a result of the negative-induced voltage in series with the battery voltage. I presume Pin goes down with the rotor installed.

So is there a problem or something that apparently hasn't been explained?

Just quoting myself as it seems to have gone unnoticed.

Anyone?

[verpies]

Just quoting myself as it seems to have gone unnoticed.
Anyone?

It seems to have gone unnoticed because you are preaching to the proverbial choir.
I call it EMF superposition and like to use it for open coils.

[poynt99]

I may have missed it but I haven't seen anyone mention it.

Seems that the claims being made here are in regards to higher efficiency when the rotor is installed, and an explanation was requested. Again, I've not seen one.

So I offered an explanation and asked for feedback. Apologies if the entire choir already has everything figured out, but it doesn't appear so to me.

[poynt99]

You have me confused.

What explanation did you offer?

Maybe I am the one confused. My understanding is that Brad claims the circuit is more efficient when the rotor is used, because Pin goes down, and Pout remains constant. I am not certain if or how Pout was measured though.

My explanation was regarding how or why Pin decreases when the rotor is used.

If it is what you quoted then that is not an explanation but rather a statement, an observation of what it is that is being looked into.

It is an explanation if you put a little thought into it. I'm done spoon feeding.

If it is what you quoted then you should of also included that the cost to run the rotor is less than the increase in efficiency gained.

Then that would leave it at the methodology of that operation.  This part I have seen a few conjectures for, but no explanation that has been tested for yet.

This makes no sense to me, so  .