Rotating Magnetic Field's and Inductors.

[tinman]

Here is that video of Mags i was talking about.
Get your self a large disc magnet and a glass table,and try it. You will be surprised at how strongly it pulls to align to the earths fields.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gOO7OHHeMM

[gotoluc]

Interesting, I've never seen such a demo. So if you can find yours I would like to see it.

The other interesting thing is to use a body of water to demonstrate this, since to move an object over water you usually needs more force then to move the same object using wheels and bearings on a flat surface.

Luc

ADDED
Just saw your post and mags demo. It would be more convincing to see it move over a large distance like a pool.

[wattsup]

@all

Maybe I can chime in here for a moment on Faradays Law.

Is there a document available that has all the empirical data Faraday accumulated and used to make his "Laws". If not then how can we be sure it is a Law? The word Law is a misnomer. It should not be Faradays Law of Induction, it should be Faradays Observations of Inductive Deficiency. The former is a grand limitation that Cabalist would use to control your exuberant mind to not wander away from their energy plan and is now the only accepted model for energy, while the later is an open door to fight against a deficiency. So which side should an OUer be on?

I suggest we not start 2016 on any confrontational note. We need everyone on the same page and gripping will not cut it.

Otherwise take one Faraday Law. Define an acceptable experiment and measurement method to put it to the test and see for yourself if the "Law" is a Law or a deficiency and how accurate it is or were they using widely rounded figures. Were are the notes that justify his premise?

I gave you guys a big observation which I call Half Coil Syndrome and showed that the pulse across a coil dissipates close to 75% of the impulse within the first half of a coil. Does anyone care to refute this. None so far and thanks to @tinman for working it as well. My next video will show even more. I also showed a way to increase the impulse across the total length of a primary coil (or working primary) but again seems no one has payed any attention so I guess optimized primary pulsing is not important to OUers.

But, what does this say about Faraday? What is says is very simple. When Faraday was measuring across a cored or air coil he was seeing the same thing but he did not realize the second half of the coil was not giving those results but it was the core (or wind) of the second half that reacted to the 75% impulse on the first half of the core (or coil) which was then reflected to the second half of the core (or coil) and not any direct impulse attributions to the second half of the coil. The game can only be won if you know who the real players are. Faraday could not see HCS so his Laws are somewhat skewed, like it or not. Because of Faraday, you guys see a sinewave pulse on a coil and think the pulse is equal across the complete length of the coil, but it is not.

In order to obtain Overunity, we need to look beyond the Laws which are not Laws but more indicators of deficiency in how we make our toys. So let's explore this a little...

Technically, all the output of every device ever made ended up with two output wires that "carried" that power to a load. So in essence, those last two lengths of wire can convey the produced power to the anticipated load so those final lengths of wire encompass all the required atoms and spin directionality of the total system. Sooooooooooooo..... technically those two lengths of wire, or even only one length of wire should be enough to receive the total "induction" and then be connected to the same load with the same outputing effort.

The use of wound coils is the most inefficient method to produce energy, because in every case, be it primary pulsed or rotating magnet, only a small percentage of the core, of the wire and of a cohesive power directional effort is realized, hence our coulping coefficients stink to the umpteenth degree.

If electrons were a true fact of life moving at such fast speeds through a coil, then HCS should be impossible because as soon as the impulse is at the start of the coil, it should have reached the end of the coil at the same instance it should not have time to produce resistance or inductance alone. So resistance and inductance has to be a physical phenomenon hence the construct itself is deficient and it is flat out in our faces every day. Electron flow is impossible and the simple invention of Teslas AC should have sent ripples down the spine of the EE construct decades ago, but it did not. It was just ignored and at the time Tesla either did not see it or did not want to spite the hand that was feeding him or he saw that the electron construct has entangled itself so well into the scientific consciousness that it would have been impossible for one man to fight it in those days. But in all cases, AC proves electron flow is impossible. Try and refute that with your best shot and we will have more fun. hahaha

But let's just advance instead........

If you take a #18 copper wire, one atom of copper inside that wire is like a drop of water in a river. When you wind that wire on a core or leave it air core that has a set magnet passage vector line, you have just multiplied the complexity of how those copper atoms are going to produce a winning percentage of cooperating atoms in one direction is like a world war at each pulse. It''s like producing a winding river on flat land with wind blowing on one side. How will the river flow?

We have no idea the level of conflict that arises because we only see the surface effects. We need to stop seeing the surface effects and realize that we are working with wire that itself has a three dimensional matrix then the winding itself as having a second three dimensional varying levels of exposure and angularity that is given by a passing magnet. The internal forces are huge at the atomic level even though the nucleic movements are minuscule, they all add up, subtract or simply stay static to the effect simply because NOT ALL ATOMS ARE PERFECT and/or are perfectly positioned in the two 3D matrixes to take part in the............ Hmmmmmmm.... I'll say "foreplay" because it is very intense.

See this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbLvy-ayi4A
or search google for the "sound of an atom". That sound is the nucleus of the atom being tracked by a probe and pulling the complete atom from one point to another. There are no electron responsible for this. Listen to the strength of the scratching sounds. hehehe

What we need is to no longer do business as usual. No more wound coils. Impulses or magnet passage across straight wire but better still around straight wire. Magnet passage across a bundle of straight protruding wires is another. See the diagram I have prepared below. Straight magnet to copper, no laminations, no turns of wire to provide any room for internal cancellation events or at least to minimize this to the lowest level possible. What is required are designs that eliminate what @tinman was talking about and that the effects before and after TDC. We want the output to leave the device as fast as possible, with the least turns or changes in vectors possible in order to minimize the cancellation events we live with in our standard coils.

If you are an OUer and you wake up every morning reciting the Energy Conservation Prayer, you should really think of changing hobbies.

These guys are unknowing deploying direct output. Look at the outputs versus rpm. With very little drag.
http://www.qm-magnet.com/about3.html

wattsup

PS: To the moderator, if this post is not welcome, please delete it. I will understand. It's just that no one is hanging around at OUR these days and I am wondering if it was because of me. Always paranoid of being off topic or out of your mind set. hehehe

[MileHigh]

Wattsup:

I made a few short comments a week or so ago about your proposition.

I am attaching a drawing showing two auto-transformers for you to contemplate.  I am assuming that you would agree that a coil in an auto-transformer setup is almost acting like a potentiometer in the sense that it acts like an AC voltage divider?

MileHigh

[Magluvin]

Interesting, I've never seen such a demo. So if you can find yours I would like to see it.

The other interesting thing is to use a body of water to demonstrate this, since to move an object over water you usually needs more force then to move the same object using wheels and bearings on a flat surface.

Luc

ADDED
Just saw your post and mags demo. It would be more convincing to see it move over a large distance like a pool.

Well it convinced me where ever I tried it. I had never experienced it in all my years of having magnets around.

Of course, a magnet is in a compass.   But I never knew how strong the earths field was till I had that experience.  I was running around for a week showing people as i had thought there was something wrong or a change in the earths field.  Because I have had magnets rolling on tables many times before and had never seen this. Still bugs me how strong it is.

Mags