Moon Walkers.

[tinman]

When you post images, would you please provide image numbers?  It just takes way too long trying to track down image info without them.

Thanks...

PW

PW
All most all the images i post have the image number in the lower left corner. There have been only a couple that i have missed,and that is also some times due to it being an expanded view of the image that accompanies it that has the image number attached. only the flag images are the ones that have no number that i can see from a quick look,

Also,what did you make out from the video you asked me to repost about the flag wavering as the astronaut bounced on by.?.

[tinman]

Seriously though does that look like something built with a multibillion dollar budget or something thrown together by a group of people for a studio production.

On take off the rocket was pulling between 3 to 4 g's  under that much force, the rocket undergoes a tremendous amount of vibration. Anything not perfectly aerodynamic will simply strip off due to wind resistance. Do you honestly believe that service module wouldn't have simply fallen apart on take off?

Those sheets of metal would peel away in the first 3 seconds. They are obviously not really part of any rocket that launched from earth and nothing more than a studio prop. So why did they use them in the photo's  ? 

Manufacturing and engineering was far more advanced than that studio prop in 1969.  Example  Look at how cars were built in 1969, this was the era of the supercars with Ferrari Dino and Lamborghini Miura.  You could say but yes this was a "one off" not a production line so here is the 1969 Australian Holden Hurricane concept car only one ever built and it only needed to make it to the local car show and not the moon.

Nice car

The pictures of the part of the CSM that looks like it is covered in duct tap, is of the command module-not the service module part of the CSM. The command module is the part that has to survive re/entry,and keep the astronauts safe. If that tape can withstand re/entry-then i want a dozen rolls of it.

Brad

[picowatt]

PW
All most all the images i post have the image number in the lower left corner. There have been only a couple that i have missed,and that is also some times due to it being an expanded view of the image that accompanies it that has the image number attached. only the flag images are the ones that have no number that i can see from a quick look,

Also,what did you make out from the video you asked me to repost about the flag wavering as the astronaut bounced on by.?.

Tinman,

I have already responded to the flag video.  Go back a page...

[picowatt]

Now just to keep MH happy,i will not comment on what i see that is covering the command module.

Don't hold back now....   What do you see covering the CM?

PW

[lumen]

A picture is worth a thousand words, ----- even if none of then are right!

It appears to be increasingly important to prove the moon landings were fake.
What is there to be gained?

Blistered paint from heat! Why only some spots?
More likely a retouched area that blistered form outgassing in the vacuum.

It appears that some are trying to outsmart a group of rocket scientists that put more total hours into a project than a single person could over their lifespan.
If you dedicated your life to first studying all the aspects of these space missions and all the issues of space flight, then you would likely understand the pictures much better.
Missing moon rocks? In fact many of the real moon rocks were destroyed in test, ended up in a personal collection, not displayed as the real rock was stolen or feared might be and many other happenings.

So how does this story end when for every proof of fakery there are several additional proofs it was in fact real.
You really think that only the US was able to monitor the mission and no other country intercepted the video directly from its source as real time proof.

If you do then you probably were not old enough to understand the state of the world at that time or simply played to many video games and cannot distinguish reality.