Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



To be deleted

Started by nul-points, February 02, 2016, 07:23:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

nul-points

Quote from: Void on December 10, 2018, 05:04:04 PM
[...]

There is no point at all in comparing input and output currents in regards to trying to analyze efficiency of the circuit.
As I have already explained, efficiency of a circuit is determined from the ratio of average output power to average input power.
Comparing currents alone gives no indication whatsoever on the efficiency of a circuit

[...]


the supply and the 2 significant current branches share a common voltage (let's call that voltage Vsupply)

the generic equation for a measure of Energy = Volts * Amps * Time

say we measure our energy for a period of 20 cycles (let's call the total time t1)

Our energy supplied for this period is

  Esupply = (Vsupply * Isupply * t1)

Our energy converted for this period is:

  Ein = (Vsupply * Iin * t1)


therefore
Efficiency, n,  = Ein / Esupply = (Vs * Iin * t1) / (Vs * Isupply * t1)

the voltages cancel (because they are common to Numerator and Denominator)


so now Efficiency, n,  = (Iin * t1) / (Isupply * t1)

the time values cancel (because they are common to Numerator and Denominator)


and now Efficiency, n,  = (Iin) / (Isupply)


this is the calculation i show in my overview diagram (and i also used in some previous posts)

so - we ARE able to calculate Efficiency using only current values WHEN the current branches share a common voltage (which they do) AND all the current readings are averaged over a common measurement period (which they are)


in my example above (overview diagram), Vsupply = 3.7V, t1 = 20 cycles (approx 60uS) - these cancel and leave us with:

  Efficiency, n, = (6.93 mA) / (5.7 mA) = 1.2  (= 120%)


Quote from: Void on December 10, 2018, 05:04:04 PM[/size]
[...]

At any rate, it should be clear already that this circuit configuration gives no indication at all of OU.

lol



np
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

Void


itsu


Come on guys, lets agree to disagree for the time being.

I need to make some 4 more measurements to get a decent average and then i can make some duration tests.
See how long it takes to drain the battery.

I can also change the frequency to see if there are major changes in the severall power users, perhaps there is a sweet spot somewhere.

But step  by step.


Thanks,   itsu

nul-points





hi Itsu


everybody is entitled to an opinion (that includes all of the posters to this thread) - i hope that no opinions have been restricted on this thread?


maths is maths however, and if two sets of values, eg. Current and Energy (under the limits explained), are proportional then you can certainly use one set as validly as another when calculating a ratio/proportion or percentage

if i see someone claiming otherwise** as justification for denying a possibility then i am going to call it out

...and i would hope that ANY other well-intentioned and informed person would do the same


(**does anyone here think that we should not flag up maths issues like this?)



the duration tests sound good - as one part of my investigation with these tests i've been logging battery terminal voltage vs time - it''ll be interesting to compare our results and try to get a better idea of the characteristics of this circuit



np


"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

Void

Quote from: itsu on December 11, 2018, 08:30:02 AM
Come on guys, lets agree to disagree for the time being.

Hi Itsu. Anyone is free to do as they wish. It is already very clear that the circuit
is not producing OU however, and that is fair and honest assessment. All the best.