I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

[Dog-One]

Well then bring a bucket of energy and we'll compare yours to mine and we'll see who has more energy?

Come on Frank, loop that puppy.  You're keeping us in suspense.

[MeGaFaRR]

To: AlienGrey
Yes it might be similar to my machine but I have no way of knowing as they don't really explain anything in that video how it would work. But you have to love the fact that they get an expert on this that says "THAT WONT WORK". Lol neither do the government officials know either but they are fine with rejecting his claims because that's what they've all been train to do. GOOD BOYS. Pat pat. So ya I admire the gentleman in this video way more than the so called expert and the government officials.

[MeGaFaRR]

Sorry memoryman:
If you don't know the difference between sarcasm and humor. I'm not sure I could really help you
Have a great day

[ARMCORTEX]

I have talked before about disconnecting the Power source before, thanks you for bringing interesting ideas forward.

Do you think your system could be maintained by powerul Impulses once it reaches higher speeds even if there was massive OU drag?

Do you think the clutch effect could somehow be emulated by purpously bad belt effects?

If adding the generator, try modifying the alternator windings, some hearsay that Krstan Pejic does this. This comes from a source who went there to see the man.

But for now, lets talk about your idea, perhaps these are totally unrelated inventions.

The real question, and where you should be concentrating your efforts is in the followeing scenario. With your apparatus, once brought up to speed, and impulses of input power + input loss, will you be able to continuously feed greater power loss on the generator side.

Now you have no rate of loss, as memoryman has said.

You have yet to prove a magic effect, I dont think endless chain of weights is attractive solution? How big do you wish to make this.

[sm0ky2]

I am going to pose a series of redundant questions, the answers to which, will define everything you think you understand.

What is energy?
What is momentum?
What is kinetic energy?

What is the kinetic energy of a particle that has no Mass?
What is its' Momentum?

and Why?

Let us take the basic example of a Photon.

We can create photons, measure their "energy", send them along a trajectory, and measure both their kinetic energy (impact),
and momentum (induction).
these particles have no mass.

Take a good look at the questions stated above, and YOUR OWN answers to them.

And try to answer the question "why?"

Where from, does this massless particle obtain its' momentum?

How does something with no mass, have kinetic energy while in motion, that is different from its' kinetic energy while stationary?
What does this information do to your "equations"?
Are they still "equivalent"?

fell free to keep this moment of self-awareness private, or share if you are duly inclined.
These questions are completely rhetorical, and intended for personal enlightenment.