I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

[MeGaFaRR]

To void:
I do apologize for being snippy but what I've built is just one of many designs I've tried to complete but if you read my statement this morning that I posted, I am claiming that, that version is an old concept but still proved to me that it is right in design but antiquated in practicality.

What I have put forward is something that at this moment I cannot fund or have the ability to complete at this time.

Power unit. Then transmission. Then flywheel. With momentum you have built a F.E.S.S. that is more than adequate to power itself. I do not like arguing with anyone, I just get frustrated when I get told you are wrong when everything I've done says I'm right and no one answers the simple physics questions I put forward. To bring arguments forward about wind and solar does not have anything to do about my proposal I have put forward.

Thanks and with all regards if you want to disprove what I have just stated about my theory then by all means, do so.
Frank

[MeGaFaRR]

Ok, I will state all the facts today that I believe to be true. Now as I post them you are more then welcome to disprove any facts I put forward but please at anytime keep them relevant to the facts being stated.
Now with my old contraption I built, I've proven that with momentum and power source at full rpm's that I can always add with clutch approximately another 60% size flywheel to flywheel that is already in motion without barely losing any momentum from power source.
If there are any comments to argue this point please state them now.
Thanks
Frank

[memoryman]

Until you measure very carefully AND know how to interpret your measurements, you have speculation, nothing more.
Adding a transmission is nothing new and won't make a difference.
Using Phi or any other other ratio won't make a difference.
If you are not getting more energy out than in, what is the purpose of this?

[Void]

What I have put forward is something that at this moment I cannot fund or have the ability to complete at this time.

Hi Frank. Ok, no worries. Then I guess your only option to see if your ideas will really work as you think
is if someone else is willing to build a prototype and put it to a proper test, to see if it will self run.

Some things that may interest you:

There is a guy in the USA named Jesse McQueen who filed for a patent in 2006 for a configuration in which
an electric motor drives and electric generator (without any flywheel used, I believe), and Mr. McQueen claims that
by using a modern high efficiency electric motor and a high efficiency generator, and with the proper gearing
between the motor and generator, that it will not only self run, but produce a fair bit of excess power as well.
Now just because he filed for a patent, it doesn't mean that it really works as he claims, but it does show that
Mr. McQueen was seemingly serious enough about his claims that he was willing to spend the money to
apply for a patent for his particular configuration. From what I recall, Mr. McQueen claimed in an interview that
he was working with someone from the UN in investigating his device, and I think he also said that some company
had bought the rights to his patent from him and that the company was going to develop the device. 
You can find Jesse McQueen's patent application here:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7095126B2/en
PDF File:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US7095126.pdf


An electrical engineer in the UK named Harold Aspden (now passed on), claimed that he noticed in some informal tests he did with running
a machine with a spinning rotor on it, that after an initial run to bring the machine up to full speed and letting it run for a few
minutes at full speed, and then bringing the machine to a stop, that subsequent tests of bringing the machine up to full
rotational speed would take less energy consumption from the driving electric motor, than the first run.  Mr. Aspden theorized that the machine
may be drawing in energy from 'the vacuum' which was was causing this anomaly. However, Mr. Aspden apparently never followed
up on those original informal tests in which he observed the unusual effect that he reported, and so I don't know
if there are much more details about his exact setup than that available.
You can read a little about Mr. Aspden's description of the effect he claimed to have seen here:
http://www.haroldaspden.com/lectures/30.htm
If there is really something to the effect that Mr. Aspden claimed to have noticed by accident when conducting some
other tests, then it might explain how it could be possible that a motor/generator arrangement could bring
in more energy than is being supplied through the driving motor alone.

One forum member here attempted to put this concept to a test using an electric motor to drive a large flywheel, but
I don't know if Grum tested much beyond the quick test he showed in the following youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m85GS5APXfk

[AlienGrey]

The Fibonacci Sequence - God's Mathematical Design of the Universe

http://youtu.be/8Vajq-UK2aE

yes now see how big a computer program would be to produce that out put for 8 bits on a stand alown micro chip !
from a look up table, unless you know how to do it with out screw up glitches