Violation Possible of Newtons Law

[Hope]

Whoppies verification of this principal in video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kSG1nroy_WM


Thz for watching.

[synchro1]

The spinning rotor slows down as the weight rises. There's no gain here, simply a transfer of foot pounds of torque from the slowing rotor to the rising bar. The energy dissipated by the spinning rotor would be enough to lift the bar and rotor straight up on a vertical axis. 

[lumen]

This device looks similar to several other designs but operates on different concept.
It seems it's operation could be easily calculated but it's operation complicates the math.

This is an acceleration lifter in that the lift is caused from the acceleration of the discs rotation.

Operation:
The arm with the discs is spinning at 1000 RPM from a motor attached to the center point.
The discs are free to spin on the arm that's rotating them but at this time they are not spinning. (only going around a circular path on the arm)

In the "Q1" quadrant  the disc is clutched to the driving arm and gains an RPM equal to the arm rotation of 1000 RPM.
In the "Q2" quadrant the main drive motor applies energy to replace the energy lost in the arms rotation by disc pulling energy from the arms rotation.
In the "Q3" quadrant the disc is clutched to a roberval connection to the center pivot which stops the rotation of the disc having no effect on the arm.
In the "Q4" quadrant the same as Q2.

Q1 and Q3 occur at the same time on opposite discs, so one "Q3" is stopping and "Q1" is starting rotation of the discs but only one has an effect on the arm.

The starting of disc rotation in Q1 will pull the enter upward as energy is required to spin the disc from 0 to 1000 RPM over a single quadrant but the stopping of the disc in Q3 has no effect on the arms rotation and in fact places a counter rotational torque against the base that the driving motor is mounted on so the device compensates for the motors forces during Q2.

Additionally, if the discs were clutched magnetically so the clutching energy to and from the discs could be recovered, then the device could operate with almost no input energy.

So 80% of the energy could be recovered starting the disc's rotation and another 80% recovered stopping the disc.

[ARMCORTEX]

If you think you have something that goes against Newton, you should design it, then manufacture a prototype.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zofLzxcc5AE&nohtml5=False

Then you will either fail and learn something useful or suceed in yoru free energy quest.

[lumen]

It's more of a space drive but it does appear that energy could be extracted.