100W Wireless and Single-Wire Power Transmission

[NickZ]

  As I mentioned, what we are being told are lies, on purpose.  As well as what is being taught in our schools concerning space.
  Light production is not due to the presence of dust.  It's due to the photosphere of the planet on the side facing the sun.  A space craft flying towards the sun at midday would be in complete darkness in no time at all.
Most everything that NASA has told us are lies.
    If you shown a strong laser light from a craft in deep space, (dust-free space), What would happen.  No light?  Light, what?

[spg]

Hi, Lee

       As an example of what I'm saying, if you 'click' on the 'Web address above, and in the 3rd row from the top, right in the middle of the row, you'll see a center PVC tube with 3 more such such tubes having enamel copper-colored magnet wire wrapped around them.
       What I'm implying is that any number of such tubes can be placed in close proximity to each other, and thusly, generate as much power as you want.   Mere experimentation on your part should give you the particular parameters of your system, as you have it set up.

I tried such experiments, but can not say that I got overunity.
If only two coils near (transmitter and receiving), the device behaves quite complicated. If you are changing the distance between the coils voltages on the receiver behave nonlinear (caused by a standing wave). With more coil around, each coil affects the other. The behavior is very complex and it is difficult to set the best parameters.

Obviously, with a good adjustment can achieve interesting results which shows the experiment with three coils of Dr. Stiffler:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIIhgHTEoM0.

My current interest is freely oscillating system - coil L3 on the scheme.
http://www.spigellab.com/2016/05/27/basic-teslas-experiments-part-1-100w-wireless-transmission-without-ground-connection/

L1 and L2 mutually interfere with the electric and magnetic fields and thus disturb each other. L3 is excited with an electric wave and freely vibrates.

In some cases, I feel like that at L3 produces more energy than it receives from L2. I am currently working device in order to be able to prove.

Spigel

[NickZ]

  But, if L3 receives more energy than was provided to L1.  How can you tell? It looks like L3 in not lighting the 100w bulb to anywhere close to the same lumin levels as a normal 100w bulb connected to the grid. What is the input voltage/wattage?
  I always found lousy conduction through the air from a normal Tesla coil, to anything further than a few feet away.
Not very efficient as far as use able light is concerned, either.

   I also don't see the connection between these table top types of Tesla coils trying to light a nearby bulb, as compared to what Tesla was trying to do.  As a light bulb lit by wireless only a few feet away from its source, is not the same as powering the world by wireless,  through the earth's ground conduction.

  Here is my latest video. On lighting a 100w bulb, through just a Kacher circuit.  It was what I can do, so far.
But, the Kacher's output is not meant for that. It's meant to provide the 2000+ voltage impulse to the induction circuit for heterodyning both circuits towards producing a self runner.  I'm not there yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpS7noQZ7DQ

[NickZ]

   The error that we are still being taught in school is, that light travels from the Sun to the Earth.  No such thing.
   There is NO LIGHT in deep space, and it's really really cold out there, also.  There is neither heat nor light coming to us from the Sun, or any other stars. Yet, the material and non material worlds are always being surrounded by the energy called Aether.
  NASA knows this, but is keeping it a secret for as long as possible.  The question is why.  The reason is because if we thought that we can produce our own light and power,  the gig would be over for the oil and power companies. Which still control this planet, it's governments, and it's people.
   I'll repeat it again:  There is no light nor heat in deep space, nor is it "traveling" to get here. Light and heat are being produced right here on Earth, and any other light bearing planet, Sun, or nebula.  We are being talk error for fact and continue to be lied to, for a reason.
  You can believe it or not, but remember that NASA is only a false front, for what is really going on in space.
  Solar panels don't even work in deep space, either.  Nuclear fuel is what drive the satelites to other planets in our solar system, like to Saturn, or Pluto, and beyond.
  Soon you'll see that what I'm talking about, is correct.  No need to argue with me, as I've heard it all before.
   I'm only suggesting that you look into, and don't simply buy their lies.

  @allCanadian:
   So, you think that there is light in space. But, not in deep space, as is being shown below in dark black shading.
http://www.businessinsider.com/where-does-space-begin-2016-7

   Nor is there any light nor heat coming from the Sun to Earth, as they would like you to believe.

[allcanadian]

@NickZ

So, you think that there is light in space. But, not in deep space, as is being shown below in dark black shading.

So your saying that because a cheesy internet diagram shows deep space is black this means you believe there is no light in deep space in reality?. You know I once saw a picture of a shark swallowing an oil tanker on the internet but I'm not sure I believe it... it was a really big oil tanker.

Nor is there any light nor heat coming from the Sun to Earth, as they would like you to believe.

I believe you just used a double nor which is a neither/neither naughty and the booleans take great offence to this. As well I do not believe them whoever they are any more than I believe you and rationalize things for myself because I can. The question is...if no light or heat came to the Earth from the Sun then how exactly do you think it got here and from where?.

AC