Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Centrifugal Power Source: The Linevich Story

Started by Eighthman, April 02, 2016, 01:38:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

memoryman

YOU are making the claims, YOU PROVE it; paper claims are nor proof.

lancaIV

Quote from: memoryman on March 30, 2017, 05:00:17 PM
YOU are making the claims, YOU PROVE it; paper claims are nor proof.

                                     your comment is irrational !
"claim/s" makes part from Linevich and others patent applications which they have had to get aproved ! Some get US patent office grant but not EP granted !

                    I am not here offering own intellectual property claims !
"paper claims are not(neither-nor) proof " is probably more "paper money warranty" related ;)

citfta

I read through the PDF.  I see a serious omission in his theory.  He is ignoring the well known law of conservation of angular momentum.  The is the law that says as the center of mass moves out in a rotating body the velocity will slow down and conversely as the center of mass moves inward the rotating body will speed up.  This is the way figure skaters get to spin so fast by pulling their arms and legs together as closely as they can.  They also stop quickly by merely putting their arms straight out.

You can prove this law to yourself if you have a piano stool or other chair that spins freely.  Just sit in chair and have someone give you a spin while you have your legs straight out.  Then pull your legs in and feel the effect.  After you speed up then put your legs back out again and you will slow down.  Pull them back in again and you will speed up again.  If the bearings in the chair are in good shape you can do this several times until friction finally slows you down.  What ever you gain by moving the center of mass in you will lose when the center of mass gets moved back out.

Respectfully,
Carroll

lancaIV

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biellmann_spin


                             http://dlinevitch.narod.ru/Eng/Vvedenie.htm


https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/20184764/otto-stein-quotdie-zukunft-der-technikquot-pdf
                                  page 21-     from the booklet

Eighthman

Thanks for posting those links. It adds stuff I haven't seen before - since much of this is in Russian, it slows things down.


Kanarev published a number of criticisms of standard physics formulas about motion and inertia. 


Suppose inertia was 'stickier' or more 'stubborn' that physics formulas would suggest?  I think this is one way to interpret what Kanarev is saying. He seems to show pulling rotation energy away from a spinning rotor very briefly without slowing it down OR perhaps adding that rotation RPM back that is less than what was taken away.


Anyhow, that's what I see about the Aspden Effect - I think it may be a genuine free energy effect in which you rob some rotation (or part of one revolution) and put it back (for less).  I understand that a physics lab in Poland replicated this effect, to its surprise. 


I can understand why people would have trouble believing this stuff.  However, has this subject been 'obstructed' by common attitudes of scientists?  Centrifugal force is breezily dismissed as a 'pseudoforce' with little thought.  Even Aspden expressed surprise at his rotational observation.