Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

[SeaMonkey]

Gravock,

Your analysis of aviation was "a try" but not a very
convincing one.  You really should take up the art
of flying.  Even over-fly Antarctica for a first hand
look.  Or do Flat-Earthers not engage in such activities
which might pose hazard to their "beliefs?"

[DR.WHO]

Its a hard fact but a true one ! All the videos I have been viewing as re rockets space planes ect ect ect all offer round and straight line horizons and some even have a concave view of the horizon .

The point is we want a round world and we plan for that and build to that and even fly around the world but we are in the 3rd dimensional plane of vision and that can not by its self conclude the world to be round when a 2 dimensional view exists ...


Its impossible to say that a two dimensional reality is not real when  the building bock for the 3rd dimensional depends on it !


Observations of optical planes are obviously real so you truly need to look at the earth with out a space suite hahahahahahahha wow I dont think they have done that one hahahahahahah may be dog one might be the forst one to give it a go hahahah


Its is flat and it is round ! One anti mater one mater ! FACT NOT FICTION !





     

[TinselKoala]

There are many videos of the midnight arctic sun, so I'm sure that they are not fakes and none of them agree with the globe model.  Here's an excellent video on the midnight sun that can be used as a visual aid if you have a hard time visualizing this.

If the earth were a globe rotating on a tilted axis as we have been taught, then from inside of the arctic circle near the outer edge where the sun is visible 24 hours a day in the summer time we should see the suns path as a clockwise rotating oval, not the up and down that is observed.

The sun supposedly travels east to west across the sky because of the direction of the earth's rotation. At night in the arctic circle we would be moving in the opposite direction in relation to the sun, so if we could see the sun at night (which we can from inside the arctic circle) then the sun would appear to be traveling the sky from west to east.

So what we should see if the earth were a globe is the sun traveling from east to west then slowing and lowering and eventually changing direction to form an oval. This is not what we see.  So the globe is debunked.

Gravock

If the earth were a globe aprox. 25,000 miles in circumference, a plane traveling at 300 mph in a straight forward east west trajectory at the equator would be gaining altitude at a rate of 8" x 300m x 300m = 6000 ft. an hour = 1.14 miles an hour = 100 ft. a minute = 1.67 ft. per second.

This rate would increase exponentially the further north or south you get away from the equator due to the smaller circumference of the globe earth near the poles when traveling in a strictly east to west direction.  So unless pilots are constantly adjusting for curvature and pointing the nose slightly downward in order to compensate (which they aren't because the earth is flat) they would be constantly gaining altitude.

If we were on a spinning globe then people in north America should be being pulled slightly southward (northward in Australia) by the centrifugal force which would be pulling us outward at a 90 degree angle from the axis of rotation which from our perspective would be slightly south. We would always be a little off balance. 

This force should be easily detected and measured if it existed but it isn't and it hasn't because it doesn't exist.

Lunar eclipses sometimes happen when the sun and moon are both visible in the sky, this proves that it is not the earth's shadow causing the eclipses.

If we were on a spinning ball orbiting the sun that is orbiting the galactic center that is traveling through space at high speed, (which is not a uniform motion) we would be constantly changing direction, speeding up and slowing down and it would be noticeable.

Gravock

It's kind of fun to toy with people like you, just to see what erroneous bullshit you come up with next, and watch how you ignore things like the Foucault pendulum experiment, or the Coriolis effect, or the many NASA space missions and those of other countries, the photographs from space, the thousands of computerized telescopes that depend on the _reality_ of the globular planet to locate their target planets and stars, the thousands of satellites launched into orbit by China, Russia, France, Great Britain, Japan, USA, even North Korea .... Watching you claim that all that absolutely consistent data is simply faked is hilarious. Come on, give us some more "proofs" of your silly claims, show us how absolutely ignorant you actually are. Make some more huge bloopers like you've made in the posts I've quoted-- they are truly hilarious.

[TinselKoala]

Its a hard fact but a true one ! All the videos I have been viewing as re rockets space planes ect ect ect all offer round and straight line horizons and some even have a concave view of the horizon .

The point is we want a round world and we plan for that and build to that and even fly around the world but we are in the 3rd dimensional plane of vision and that can not by its self conclude the world to be round when a 2 dimensional view exists ...


Its impossible to say that a two dimensional reality is not real when  the building bock for the 3rd dimensional depends on it !


Observations of optical planes are obviously real so you truly need to look at the earth with out a space suite hahahahahahahha wow I dont think they have done that one hahahahahahah may be dog one might be the forst one to give it a go hahahah


Its is flat and it is round ! One anti mater one mater ! FACT NOT FICTION !





     

Do you really think you are fooling anyone with your "new" identity?

[gravityblock]

It's kind of fun to toy with people like you, just to see what erroneous bullshit you come up with next, and watch how you ignore things like the Foucault pendulum experiment, or the Coriolis effect, or the many NASA space missions and those of other countries, the photographs from space, the thousands of computerized telescopes that depend on the _reality_ of the globular planet to locate their target planets and stars, the thousands of satellites launched into orbit by China, Russia, France, Great Britain, Japan, USA, even North Korea .... Watching you claim that all that absolutely consistent data is simply faked is hilarious. Come on, give us some more "proofs" of your silly claims, show us how absolutely ignorant you actually are. Make some more huge bloopers like you've made in the posts I've quoted-- they are truly hilarious.

If the Coriolis effect is real, then it would be impossible for a plane to land on a moving runway. The Flat Earth Documentary - 2016 covers everything you mentioned above, including a simulation of what would happen to a plane trying to land on a moving runway due to the so-called Coriolis effect.

Gravock