MH's ideal coil and voltage question

[MileHigh]

No, I was here to try to help you and talk some sense into you, and that has proved to be nearly impossible.

[ramset]

Miles
I Imagine a skilled person such as yourself should be able to "requisition" a build ,  along with
expected results ?

if you won't build it,  write a PDF doc for what you want built ,

say... for something as simple as a Joule thief
with expected result/claims

You say Tinman is a Fumbling Bench Putz ??

Prove it.

set a benchmark to the Best Of "Your" ability ...

or at least explore the feasibility of this Path [a build] to a resolution ?

you've been _called out_ By the Tinman... may times here !!

You have probably spent a thousand hours here in this thread...

spend 10 minutes and write the requisition .
we'll see if Tinsel Can/will build it to your specs and How many cheeseburgers it will cost ?



 

[wattsup]

@MH

I don't know why you keep putting my @username up on your casualty list. I suggest you refrain from doing that again.

I told you but you do not read or listen to actual words written. I though your question required an explanation of all those voltage levels occurring on their own after the first 4 volts was applied. Why else would I have said "ideal voltage does not change". Sorry that was my mistake but your question was not properly formulated to start with. Ask an ambiguous question only leads to exactly what happened. Instead of you clarifying the question and specifically saying each subsequent voltage is applied manually. So now you have learned something as well. We are now even. Please refrain from using my @username as you have. It is just not cool.

I will leave you to spat with @tinman as this is no longer my concern. Just a total waste of time. Time which you guys seems to consider being an overflow event where in reality the damn fuse is very short. So just keep wasting time and good luck.

When I first came to this forum, it was like intellectual nirvana where there were so many good minds trying to expand the base of present acceptance and explore the possibilities of OU devices. It was a great time and guys were not afraid to open their minds and sound off each other with often crazy ideas but that's where the magic was. Now it is gone. I just want to congratulate you on a job well done. This forum is now toast and guys like you are the toasters. hahaha. Now all the standard EEers can migrate here and take lessons on how to quash an OU forum.

No problem. I already had my own forum on stand-by, left dormant since 5 years now while I finalized Spin Conveyance because it actually took 10 years in all because it first relates to physics as well as chemistry and not just EE. I will just dust off that forum and keep there from now on.

Your last stint with @tinman was the last confirmation that there is no hope for EEers and OUers to co-exist and mutually expand the same damn goal when each ones goal is totally adversarial. The OUers are required to not only float above the mundane foray but to also drag along the EE as an official witness. Better EE learn on its own when the OU deed is done. Then you will be the first to want to learn a new electrical construct. We will see. No more distractions.

I took a week or so to ponder this question. Had prepared a few posts but never posted them again since this place is just not the right place. Too much noise for @members to actually contemplate and inspire each other. This is my last post on this forum as well as on OUR since both are not exactly OU oriented except for name only. I will be migrating most of my more important posts from these forums to my forum. Then continue there with only a few @members, so much less crap to deal with everyday with @members posting 20 posts a day saying nothing. It's time........

So you win. One can now confirm there are no more real OUers left at OU as well as OUR. The stage is yours. Each have now become an archive of the past but where the present can no longer be the stimulus it was. Both forums still attract a majority of @members as logged out @readers that remain and hope to read anything that will inspire progress but who will never post here again because they know the wrath is always ready to pounce and distract and/or destroy conversations worth any effort.

wattsup

PS1: EE 101 starts in 5 minutes.  Don't be late or the teacher will put you in the corner.

PS2: For those in the know. Soon. For others, once my forum is dusted off and ready to go, you will learn of it.

[MileHigh]

Thanks for another big speech Wattsup.  At least it is not nasty like the last goodbye.  I will just repeat a few simple things to you.  This thread is about basic electronics and not about OU and it was started by Brad of his own volition.  There are many threads that are primarily about basic electronics and not OU, or secondarily about basic electronics.  Hence many people on forums like this are interested in basic electronics.  Unfortunately Brad could not grasp some basic electronics concepts so the answers were given.  Note that this thread took a different tactic - figure out some basic stuff for yourself so that you will truly understand and retain the knowledge.  You will find that I haven't touched any of the other free thinking threads on this forum at all.  The forum has not been "overtaken" it's all in your head.

Oh yeah, and there was nothing wrong with the bloody question.

[MileHigh]

Chet, you are just being a pain in the butt at this time with your self-imprisoned mind.  Your poor buddy is shown that he made a clear and unambiguous statement that an ideal voltage source cannot vary in time and he flat-out denies it and states that he did not do that.  You say nothing.  It's just just another form of Orwellian mental totalitarianism, the two of you are peas in an iron pod.  Freedom is slavery.  Ignorance is strength.