Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Quasi-open System, or Dual Closed System (Thermodynamics Addendum?)

Started by philandy, June 04, 2016, 02:22:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

philandy

Hypothesis: If a closed energy system interacts with only one other closed system, there can be positive work.

My test uses a hollow ball, less dense than water but denser than air/vacuum. A second test using a ball less dense than air but denser than a vacuum. It also uses dual vertical tubes (columns) of the previously specified controlled density environments. The chambers are connected, valved, suction controlled, and osmosis resetting (meaning if an environment splashes it can be put back or replaced within tolerance). The test must also be noble and shown to work with materials that show little effect with outside influence, for example an iron ball would be movable with a magnet.

On the "left" or first column where such a ball is introduced into the environment at the bottom, it would float, hit a mechanical switch controlling the valves appropriately, hit a mechanical switch to osmosis reset, buoy, then propel above the environment and transition through the above valve into the "right" or last column. The ball would then fall, hit a mechanical switch controlling the valves appropriately, hit a mechanical switch to osmosis reset, settle, then propel below the environment through the below valve into the "left" or first column. A cycle has thus happened and beyond polish maintenance it will recycle.

Height controls total kinetic energy.

The problems are costs associated with osmosis resetting, valve sealing, and polish maintenance.

Would anyone else help me explore this?