Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

[Berto3]

ZL, there is mainly a monologue going on in this tread but also on the whole German OU website.
Alvaro, watch this tread for capacitive windings at the German OU website.
http://www.overunity.de/1486/kapazitiver-transformator/msg45138/#msg45138
Some links lead you further to explanations in english on this theme.
Capacitive windings and capacitive transformers are indeed very interesting.

[lancaIV]

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megjln01.htm


experiment result : The power OUTPUT increase of 53.6% while the power INPUT increase of 0.35%when the magnet is added at one side of the ferrite rod...

experiment result: The power OUTPUT on a 100 ohms resistor is13.78mWwithout magnet
The power INPUT is 853.2mW without magnet.

experiment result: The power output on a 100 ohms resistor is 30.39mWwith the magnet
The power INPUT is 856.2mWwith the magnet

experiments and results do interest me and the repeatability and not names or titles.


And here the "Pseudo-M.E.G." output - as shown- is ever under input.           C.O.P. < 1

But one result is real   : with magnets included there is a better result 

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megdsqth.htm
Writing about "cascading" : how treat the inrush current of each stage ?
                                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current
When a transformer is first energized, a transient current up to 10 to 15 times larger than the rated transformer current can flow for several cycles. Toroidal transformers, using less copper for the same power handling, can have up to 60 times inrush to running current.

                                            input frequency and output frequency of each device ?


                                                         End costs of each produced output-KWh ?


                                              Or using the "inrush current" as "puls(e) current" ?

[ZL]

lancaIV,

You are still evading to answer my questions directly, which is a very bad sign.

Let me ask those questions again, with a bit modification to be more specific, not to give more room for further irrelevant evasions:

Do you believe that the MEG generates FE as Bearden claimed?
Did you replicate the MEG and performed measurements on it? If yes, then with what results?

Do you believe that the MEG replication measurement of Naudin on this webpage:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm  is correct?
Do you believe that those who criticized the MEG and its replication by Naudin (which he described at the above link) are liars? The critiques I am talking about can be found here:

http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_phact.org/z/bearden.htm

Please direct answers only... I am not interested in any other real or imaginary merits of Naudin, or whether the magnet does anything in the MEG (according to him) or not, or any other evasions at this time. If you give direct and straight answers, then we can continue this discussion, otherwise an obvious disinfo operation is developing here right in front of our eyes...

[ZL]

ZL, there is mainly a monologue going on in this tread but also on the whole German OU website.

Would you care to elaborate?

[ZL]

This is an update about the examination of the passive power amplifier patent US8653903.

As a warm up exercise for more fruitful work, the circuit has been tested in a computer simulator.
Using many circuit variations, component values, and swept frequencies, the patent circuit failed to produce any excess energy.

Now my initial knowledge-based prediction has been validated, and we can know for certain that this circuit is not a free energy generator as the inventor claimed. Naturally this is hardly a surprise or a disappointment, because it was expected. When a patent is granted to an invention that explicitly claims the generation of excess energy, then that is most probably a hoax perpetrated by the energy mafia to discredit the subject, and lure potential investors into traps.

Only the energy mafia is able to get patents granted to such fake FE inventions that explicitly claim excess energy, because they own and control the patent system. A real free energy invention that claims excess energy will not get any patent granted, as long as this mafia is in control of the system.

On the other hand if an invention that can generate excess energy gets a patent by not claiming the usefulness of the device for the generation of such excess energy, then the patent is of no use for FE purposes. Primarily because it does not claim that it is an FE machine, and those seeking such inventions will not find it. Secondly, it will not grant priority for inventing that device as an FE generator, because the patent protects only what is claimed.

For example if you invent and patent the wheel as useful in vehicle support, it will not grant you priority of discovery for other uses of the same wheel. That same wheel can be used as a flywheel on a spinning stationary machine to store rotational mechanical energy, and another person can patent it for that specific purpose, and he is to be considered the inventor of the flywheel, not you. Therefore patents and the patent system in general are completely useless for FE inventions as long as the energy mafia owns the system.

Quite often such hoax FE patents are created in a field that really can produce excess energy. They mimic a real FE device in a way which produces no excess energy, but looks similar to a device that can. This way the deception and confusion they create is the most potent.

The lesson from this exercise to take home is to realize that there is an active and intense disinformation campaign waged against free energy inventions (and genuine researchers), in which the patent offices are also heavily involved.