Free Energy from Electromagnetic Wave Fields

[pomodoro]

What happens with the formula when you have destructive interference?

[ZL]

What happens with the formula when you have destructive interference?

If you read and understand the explanations of the principle on my website (and/or Mr. Vajda's book) you will understand that the energy balance is symmetrical. In the same way (and for the same reason) as excess energy can be generated based on constructive wave superposition, energy can also be destroyed when destructive interference is used instead. If this would not be so, then the universe would be extremely unbalanced, and we would most probably not exists in human form at all.

[pomodoro]

A quick read on the net shows that when two equal amplitude sound waves add they double in amplitude yet their power level only goes up by 6dB, which is 4x , just as expected, not any higher. Doubt this secret gas been hidden so long.

[ZL]

A quick read on the net shows that when two equal amplitude sound waves add they double in amplitude yet their power level only goes up by 6dB, which is 4x , just as expected, not any higher. Doubt this secret gas been hidden so long.

Why don't you cite your reference? Is it a secret? Or are you arguing just for the sake of arguing?
I don't see any sign of logical thinking in your post.

The 4x resultant output power is exactly what I would predict as well, and exactly what proves the invalidity of the law of energy conservation in wave fields.

Let me spoon feed it for you: 2 units of power enter the system and after constructive superposition 4 units of power leave the system. The power gain is 4[W]out/2[W]in=2. We have gained twice as much power at the output as it has entered at the input.

[conradelektro]

For some (probably valid) reasons our goodman ZL and the originator Mr. Vajda are not able or willing to do more experiments or to build a prototype device providing excess energy.

So, we are stuck with words and personal opinions. Very unsatisfying situation and no conclusion in sight (like always). If one wants to contradict long established research the evidence has to be very strong and a working device seems to be the only way out. And exactly the working device is always missing when so called OU claims are made.

Lets's be grateful that nature does not allow OU. It would be the end of earth. Greedy and power hungry individuals would create a runaway situation causing incredible destruction. All military forces would try to outdo the enemy with excess energy. And almost all good people would waste energy like mad if it were available in abundance and very cheaply. Too much harm to the environment is done already by almost everybody even without OU devices. (I am no exception, unfortunately.)

OU is basically a runaway situation. A closed loop would create energy without bounds.

Greetings, Conrad

P.S.: I suspect ZL wants to advertise books or CDs and therefore he brings up the subject in certain Intervalls.