Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


New proposed design for RegenX

Started by Over Goat, August 12, 2016, 05:36:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Over Goat

In an electric vehicle, it would have to put out dramatically more power than it consumes, to make the weight expenditure even worth it.

citfta

I really don't see anything unusual about this "new" design.  What you are looking at is commonly called a dynamotor.  They were used extensively by the military during World War II.  They can be made several different ways.  Some had a DC input and an AC output.  Some had both DC input and output for changing voltage.  And some had AC input and AC output for changing voltage and/or frequency.  Here is a link to some pictures of some different kinds of dynamotors:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dynamotor&t=ffsb&iax=1&ia=images


The second stator in the drawing is the output.

Carroll

Over Goat

Quote from: Erfinder on August 13, 2016, 08:31:25 AM

The rotor field excites the red coils.  That much is clear.  There is more to this, however, the question is who is going to build it and demonstrate that there is?  I'm not.  I say that because I know better now.  Motor and generator are one, and should be treated as such, in this example, which may have merit, they are treated as they have always been treated.  I do not agree with the idea that we should treat the two independently.

as you already pointed out, this is not even a motor, as there is no mechanical output at all.
It only outputs electricity, so its purely a generator. 
It could act as a portable (vehicular) generator or as a stationary generator , but only if the
power output is significant enough to make it worthwhile.