Exceptions / Loopholes to Lenz's Law - Photovoltaics Or Any Thing Else

[guest1289]

   I assume  photovoltaics  are an exception / loophole to Lenz's Law .

   Has anyone made a  transformer/induction  just using photovoltaics, or any other similar method,  that does not use any type of pulsating-current,  just smooth current .

   (  eg,  it could just be a light-bulb in a box lined with solar-panels,  or using much more sophisticated designs And Materials )

   It's odd how a hot wire can emit light,  and yet it can't act as a converter of light into electricity.
     - And yet a wire receives radio signals and converts them to electricity
     - It must be something to do with frequency,  since even sunshine must have a frequency.

   I assume it's much more complicated than just frequency, it may also include all of the other properties of whatever radiation is considered.

   (  THE FOLLOWING IS VERY STUPID :  If wire does actually convert light into electricity,  maybe we can't detect that  electrical-current  because of something to do with the very very high frequency ,  maybe,   if a permanent-magnet is involved anywhere in the apparatus,   it behaves in a different manner in response to that very very high frequency,  or does not react to it.
      In other words,  permanent-magnets  react differently( or not at all ) to,  when the very very high frequencies of radiation like light is reached .     )

        Regularly,  there are new materials( methods ? ) discovered for converting light into electricity

        Can a  Transformer  be made that is based on photovoltaics or any other similar method,  a transformer  that does not create any eddies or is affected by them,  that does not use any type of pulsating-current,  just smooth current .  ?

    Can an  Electric-Motor  be made that is based on photovoltaics or any other similar method,  a motor that does not create any eddies or is affected by them,   that does not use any type of pulsating-current,  just smooth current,  and no commutation  ?

   
   

[guest1289]

   I just realized that a possible answer to some of my questions is that  maybe  Lenz's Law  stops functioning/being-relevant  when the very-very high radiation frequencies like light are reached .

   I wonder what that would mean for something like the  Figuera-Device( claimed overunity generators ),  overunity-generators where the frequency constantly increases and increases,  and that current is stopped from turning into light by the limits of the wire material,   but could the frequency in one of these devices reach a frequency where  Lenz's Law  stops functioning/being-relevant ? 

[guest1289]

    What I've typed in the previous posts in this thread,  may be the secret to making a successfully functioning  Solid-State-Overunity-Generator.

   That  'Lenz's Law'  stops functioning/stops-being-relevant  when a certain very very high frequency is reached,  near the frequency of some type of light .

   This could explain why current at this frequency would not be detected by apparatus which use permanent-magnets.

   Some evidence of this could be :
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetization_reversal_by_circularly_polarized_light
    which is a reversal of :
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_effect

    But I'm sure there's much more associated research into this .

[guest1289]

   That  'Lenz's Law'  stops functioning/stops-being-relevant  when a certain very very high frequency is reached,  near the frequency of some type of light .

   This could explain why current at this frequency would not be detected by apparatus which use permanent-magnets.

   Some evidence of this could be :
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetization_reversal_by_circularly_polarized_light
    which is a reversal of :
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_effect

    But I'm sure there's much more associated research into this .

   I have been wondering,  that if I am right that  'Lenz's-Law'  no longer applies at high enough frequencies,  then  could  this indicate that other laws of electromagnetism may also be erroneous  in the right circumstances,  or frequency.

  I was thinking about    'Ampère's Circuital Law'     
     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amp%C3%A8re%27s_circuital_law

  (  It's the only other relevant law I know,  since I have almost no internet at the moment to do enough research,  etc  )

   So me trying to find a fault with  'Ampère's circuital law'   at high enough frequencies ( light frequencies .

____
    The Following Is Related,  But I'm Wrong In This Subject
    -  I was thinking that  'maybe'  electromagnetic-fields  around  electrical-wires  are just a result of those  electrical-wires  'not'  being  'superconductors',  in other words,   that 'when'  these wires are  super-cooled  enough to convert them into  superconductors,   that  'then'  they will not emit an  electromagnetic-field  when current flows through them.
          -   But I'm Sure I'm Wrong,    and  that 'when'  these wires are  super-cooled  enough to convert them into  superconductors,  that then they  emit a  much much stronger  electromagnetic-field  when current flows through them,   than when they are at room temperature .
____

    But anyway,  -   when you have 'steady-DC-current' like from a  chemical-battery,   flowing through a room temperature  wire,    that that  'steady-DC-current'  from a  chemical-battery  still must have some sort of frequency( must be a very very high frequency I assume,  too high for any equipment to measure ),   
     -   and that as this  'steady-DC-current'  from a  chemical-battery( with it's unknown very high frequency ),   flows through the  Non-Superconductor-Wire,   that what is actually going on inside the wire is either  'Lenz's Law'  or something like 'Lenz's Law',   in other words,   that the  current( with it's unknown very high frequency )  is actually performing some sort of induction process ?,  within and between  'non-symmetrical'( non-superconductor ) structures or elements  inside the wire,    and the reason it is doing so,   is because this   'steady-DC-current'  from a  chemical-battery,   is like a pulstating-current,   BECAUSE,   it does actually have a frequency( even though it is too high to measure ).

    So I assume,   that if you manage to transmit current through a wire,  at a frequency that is even higher than the frequency from a  chemical-battery,  that when you reach a high enough frequency,   that  the wire  should stop emitting any  electromagnetic-field,   so at that point,   even though you could keep on increasing the voltage,   the wire would not emit any  electromagnetic-field,    although doing this experiment in a way as to prevent burning out the wire,   And Thereby Finding A Fault In  'Ampère's Circuital Law'     
     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amp%C3%A8re%27s_circuital_law

   (  Obviously I know nothing about the frequency limits of wires,  etc,  etc  )