Have overunity . . . need help

[Tim Beane]

You needed help. If none can see your design, you can not expect to get any help.
A patent will also require a working prototype - which you don't have.
What kind of help do you need?
If you ask for help, and don't want our help, this thread is a waste of time ;-)

Once again I will clarify my question and needs, which were clearly outlined in my original post.  Yes, I needed help . . . specifically I need an individual who has a significant background in physics to discuss my invention with.  I did not ask for anyone to justify, verify or debunk my invention.  Do you know of anyone who has such a background?

[memoryman]

I repeat: many people have such knowledge (including myself).
The inevitable result will be that your idea will be debunked; speaking from experience, that result probably be ignored or even resented.

[Tim Beane]

I repeat: many people have such knowledge (including myself).
The inevitable result will be that your idea will be debunked; speaking from experience, that result probably be ignored or even resented.

I am not looking to debate or put anyone down.  I am far past debunking.  I am working on patents.   I have a specific need and maybe you can help.  I have received private messages and probably need to clarify a bit more . . . I need an individual with a deep education in physics to help me.  Do you have a masters degree in physics?

[conradelektro]

A person who does not want to tell whether he has a working prototype or not is best ignored.

This person does not look for an expert, he wants attention. Do not give him attention till he stops his double-talk.

I am sure that high school level of physics would be enough to teach him reality.

A patent can not protect a scientific discovery. His "patent expert" should know that. Therefore I know that we have once more a disturbed individual.

Any person with a deep education in physics will know and claim that OU is not possible. So, you have to show a working OU machine, nothing more and nothingl less. Words and theories might come after that.

Greetings, Conrad

[Low-Q]

Once again I will clarify my question and needs, which were clearly outlined in my original post.  Yes, I needed help . . . specifically I need an individual who has a significant background in physics to discuss my invention with.  I did not ask for anyone to justify, verify or debunk my invention.  Do you know of anyone who has such a background?

Well, if you are looking for a person who can discuss design with you, and someone who has proper knowledge in physics, and you post it here, and say no thanks to the ones here who want to discuss this with you, you should rather ask Michio Kaku. He is not a member here, and he is an expert in physics.
You say you got over unity, so I really do not think you need to discuss this with anyone, because you have already figured it out, but can't explain it using common laws of thermodynamics. So you need help to find a way to use laws of thermodynamics to explain your over unity. How can that be possible?
That said, I do have proper knowledge in physics, like many here. However, there are plenty of members of this forum that is more dreamers than doers. Persons who claim over unity based on a drawing and lack of practical experience. Persons who gets angry when their design is debunked. Persons who cannot swallow some pride, and go on with the next project, or make it simpler by harnessing the free energy we get from the sun.


Are you such a dreamer, I do not know if this probable discussion will lead to anything but arguing
Are you willing to offer some pride, and axcept that people does not agree with you, you are welcome to discuss this with me and other members who has proper experience in physics.


Vidar