TD replications

[Floor]

These designs, which are novel, are given into the public domain.
The designs here in, that are novel, are open sourced.

The designs here in, are presented by the internet character many know as floor (Me).

They are the product of,  the knowledge, ideas, insights, theories, and so on,
of  many many people here at the O.U. forum.  But also of Wikipedia, you tube and
so on.

They belong to me and to you.
  best wishes
   floor

[Floor]

Returning to this assembly (this morning)

Each magnet is  1 7/8 inches  long by 7/8 of an inch wide.
A magnetic pole is on this broad face.
Each magnet is 3/8 of an inch thick through from pole to pole.....

With the north poles of each magnet facing up, the five magnets
were clamped to a flat surface, edge to edge.

This forms a flat, rectangular single magnetic pole, magnet surface which
measured 4 and 3/8 inches by 1 and 7/8 inches.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

There are five magnets and therefore there are four junctions.

There is a bump in the field at each of the junctions of the magnets.
(where the edges meet)

At the first junction near an end, the out put magnet transitions the junction well.
A net force is present in the desired output magnet travel direction.

At the second and third junctions there are sticky spots.

At the fourth junction near the far end, the out put magnet transitions the junction well.
A net force is present in the desired output magnet travel direction.

... ... ... ... ... ... ...
There is a lull in desired output magnet force, near the center of the
output stroke, when a single magnet serves as the track.
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
There are sticky spots in the desired output magnet travel, when multiple magnets serve
as the track.
... ... ... ... ... ...

Oh well / bummer.  Looks like no spinny thingy here, nor perpetual motion.
Just cyclical work with a net gain, from magnets . Darn.

[Floor]

The next thing to put on the bench should
be either of the following. 

Complete, and all four actions measured.

[Floor]

Note...  there is no 1/16 set back, in the above drawing,
       (as was shown as in the previous drawing)

My next test / set up, may have some variations in the
magnet set backs / placements.

Also I have a request...

that others weigh in on the following question...
"should I follow through with this process"

    floor

[Floor]

There are about 220 views of this topic a day on average (it's small).
It's not monetized (by me).

If my goal had been large numbers of views,
I am pretty sure there would have been many millions of views
by now.

There are 4 tested and measured variations of these designs,
in which magnet interactions give rise to a net gain in mechanical
work done.

There are several other designs I have never done precise measurements of.

This latest build will be the first time I will have done a complete
public presentation of the measurement processes and results, of an O.U.
device.
... ... ... ... ... ...
In considering the energy density and the natural resources required
to produce energy from magnets on a large scale, it is readily apparent that
they are not a sole answer to our future energy needs. Only a part of that solution.
... ... ... ... ... ...
What is more significant than permanent magnet energy sources, is what kind of
energy source can next evolve from an understanding of the permanent magnet
sources. 

That would be next on my agenda.  I'll leave the magnets behind. I think some
number of others, have already arrived at some of those methods.  Others are
I think close.  But they may not be totally certain within their selves, at to
whether or not they really want to arrive at those methods.

Me to.
    So...
I'm looking for some feed back / reason to proceed.
   Got any ?

floor