Magnet force shield

[lancaIV]

Hello floor,
thanks a lot for your demonstration !

I think it is the explaining part about the magnetic force behaviour as showed by
Joe Flynns Parallel Path Magnet Technology !
Especially from the PP Egroup member  "GM" his experiment !
Figure 4
http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/magnetictechnology.htm

Sincerely
              OCWL

p.s.: the counter-part research of this "only permanent magnetic force shielding device"is an "only electro-magnetic force shielding device"
and possibel an "and/or" switch modus

page/sheet 2
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=US&NR=5254925A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19931019&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20170406&CC=US&NR=2017098975A1&KC=A1#

https://patents.google.com/patent/US8264314
A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate and compare the increase of magnetic flux achieved by the novel magnetic arrays disclosed herein as compared to other magnets, for example, neodymium magnets (NIB magnets or also known as neodymium-iron-boron magnets) or Halbach magnet arrays. Specifically, the experiments focused on changes in electromagnetic field (emf) and motor torque or horsepower. The data are reported in FIG. 8. The experimental data illustrates the increased electromagnetic field and/or motor torque generated by the novel magnetic arrays in comparison to NIB magnets and/or Halbach magnets.

[norman6538]

and this drawing as well

The problem I see with this arrangement in msg 171 is that indeed it is balanced and will
leave or return with almost no work required due to that balance BUT when it twists
even a little ie take work out - it becomes unbalanced and then requires work to reset it
for the next cycle. HOWEVER if you arrange two of these with opposite arrangements
they MIGHT balance each other so that they can be reset. I did not try this but will
arrange such a test....
So if you can get the twist arranged to balance each other then you have free permanent
magnet work....

Norman

[Floor]

@Norman6835

Yes were on the same page ie. Looking at efficiency methods / reducing friction, while also
maintaining precise alignments, without the necessity of large / rigid sliding mechanisms ect..

                                           

[norman6538]

Floor I tested the basic idea with this little setup.

First the  2 mags on the top/left are pushing away from each other and they are
tilted up so you can see what the potential work is there by the gap between them.

Then to the right you can see a magnet between the 2 magnets. Pardon all that black silicone seal that holds the magnet in place.  The second magnet is hidden behind the S.

Then off of the magnet between them you see a white tab with and arrow <----> on it indicating
that it easily slides back and forth and when it is pulled out. There is a slot in the board where the magnet travels back and forth and plastic to keep it aligned and slipery.

The top/left magnets indicate the potential repel work done because there is a wider gap than the magnet width. Its crude and quick and dirty but shows the
basic concept. It needs to be measured for work in and out. But the real problem will
be the loss of power due to "further weaker" magnetic characteristics.
But the concept is solid.

Norman

[Floor]

Thanks Norman

Here is the same demonstration (7 minute video) using 2 magnets
clamped together in opposition as the "sliding inner magnet"

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q

          floor