Magnet force shield

[conradelektro]

Please note, I have already stated that I need true measurement data to believe a device is OU. I do not just believe a device is OU until I have the measurement data to prove it or the device is running on its own and I can witness it. So please stop judging me that I just want to believe in OU as I have made no claims of OU.
Stick only to what has been presented and keep your personal opinions out.
You should know this to be the correct scientific approach.

Luc, you seem to understand what proof of OU means. I am sorry, that you were the victim of my offhand remark.

I was talking to Floor who steady fast claims OU. And I have the feeling that Dieter also claims OU and many others.

My only point:

One has to compare input-POWER and output-POWER, which brings TIME into the equation.

One should not compare FORCE and also not WORK.

WORK has to be done for some TIME to generate POWER (or energy).

I made an error last night, which is confusing. But my point now is crystal clear and the truth.

See: http://overunity.com/17097/magnet-force-shield/msg499715/#msg499715 (concerning POWER versus WORK, TIME is of the essence)

Also see: http://overunity.com/17097/magnet-force-shield/msg499638/#msg499638 (concerning a magnetic shield)


This is not my opinion, I am stating facts which nobody with a bit of brain will deny.

Greetings, Conrad

[dieter]

Conrad, however, please continue in the TD replication thread.

[Floor]

@ all readers

Here is my most recent video.  It demonstrates the nearly free rotation of
a ceramic magnet while that magnet is immersed within the field of six other magnets.


        @           http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5ckdkn

                          Also

The video demonstrates the failure of one of my designs which was intended  to
shield one magnet from a second magnet by use of a third magnet / magnets.

Please also note that while this form of shielding was not effective....

Both Gotoluc and my self  have had ... and clearly demonstrate very effective
neutralization of magnetic force actions in several videos.

                   
...

Scientific convention holds that some form of magnetic shielding occurs between  magnetic domains within
permanent magnets. 

These magnetic shield regions within a permanent magnet are given the name "Bloch walls".
                 
                                  I don't know....but
It seems probable, that the shielding provided by Bloch walls has the same kinds of limitations...
in terms of vectors of right angle directions of approach .....  in relation to specific polar alignments...
which we have encountered in our permanent magnet experiments.

But also, I am in the early stages of / developing a model for a different shielding method,
which is based on a model / modification of Bloch wall shielding.

I have nothing to present of that new model at this time, as it is incomplete.

                    thanks all
                          floor

[gotoluc]

Thanks floor for making a video demo. I always helps (me anyways) to better grasp your ideas.


Luc

[dieter]

You're probably given up too quickly, Floor.


Use Femm for shield tests, saves time and money.


I for myself found just another loophole. I would like to tell it, but usually being carefully ignored, this forum makes me only depressed, so wish you all the best Floor.