Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


getting more energy out of AA and AAA batteries

Started by mak27, April 14, 2018, 11:55:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

Quote from: mak27 on June 14, 2018, 08:16:37 AM
I believe the experiment would have turned out differently, Itsu if you had used a real piece of steel under the magnets instead of  athin piece of sheet metal ( and an L shaped one at that) So different batteries, different LEDs, different steel equal different results!!!

The burden of proof is with you. The one who claims something has to prove it. And the proof presented by you at the beginning of this thread is very weak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Proving_a_negative

Itsu could do millions of tests showing that there is no effect. But one can always claim that he did something wrong. But what he did is very strong evidence that there is nothing useful.

Therefore the only way forward (according to logic) is that the person who claims something provides the proof. Disproving something by anybody else is almost impossible and usually useless (see the above link about "proving a negative" and try to understand the logic behind it).

So, where do we stand:

- Very weak evidence from you.
- Very strong evidence from Itsu.

Greetings, Conrad

mak27

 Yes lets replicate an experiment and then change all the ingrediants and parameters and be happy with the out come

extreme BIAS anyone?

conradelektro

Quote from: mak27 on June 14, 2018, 12:58:28 PM
Yes lets replicate an experiment and then change all the ingrediants and parameters and be happy with the out come

extreme BIAS anyone?

You are sharing the destiny of most inventors. They are misunderstood, not appreciated and experience enormous bias against them.

Most of the time inventors are simply ignored or rudely overlooked. Find solace in the development that nowadays inventors are not chased out of town. The worst that can happen is that you are forcefully transported into a psychiatric ward. And there they only give you pills or shots. After a while you might be set free again. But that only happens if you defend your invention too vigorously.

I suggest you improve your device secretly and quietly. Once it produces some milliwatts you seek the attention of the public once more. Your success will be phenomenal, you will make millions and people will love you. But for now the time is not ripe for such rewards.

Greetings, Conrad

SkyWatcher123

Hi mak27, thanks for sharing your work, conradelektro is not speaking for me, that is for sure.
I'm working on another project at the moment, though i will look at what you have shared more closely and maybe try and replicate your results soon.
You seem passionate about your results, so the sane thing to do, is to respect your opinion on your results.
And humanity has been ready for a long time now, for excess energy devices, despite the few that don't wish it to happen, it will happen, that i can assure everyone of.
The domination and lack narrative will only be allowed for so long.
peace love light

mak27

Hi Skywatcher: Thanks for that, the really funny thing is that on page three reply 31 he admits I was right. By his own admission it should be able to run  for 833 days.

and then he says thats a bit more than a year. I guess he suffers from very bad math skills :D