Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



re: energy producing experiments

Started by Delburt Phend, February 04, 2017, 09:31:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

Look at your video,
Watch as the cylinder comes to a stop, frame by frame
Watch the linear distance traveled by the smaller spheres
Dont use the faulty math of the cylinder's rotational velocity.
What velocity are the spheres actually moving at?

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

sm0ky2

If you want to smack that cylinder with 9kJ thats your business..:
But if the small spheres had that energy they would have destroyed the cylinder at the end of the first test
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

Delburt Phend

If the sphere is released it could do damage. Try it yourself.  But the spheres rewrap and quickly give their momentum back to the cylinder.

The tetherball does not increase its speed because it wraps up, it only increases its rate of rotation.

Delburt Phend

Can the 'wheel and axle lrn fzx' be used to prove that energy is not a conserved quantity?

Yes: I set up two wheels, with the same drive mass, right by each other. I used the wheels as an Atwood's with the same extra added mass at the 35 mm dia. One wheel accelerated 120 g at the 35 mm diameter and the other accelerated 40 g at 105 mm diameter.

I ran them at the same time and they accelerated at the same rate.

The input energy is producing "two" quantities of energy. ½ * .120 kg * 1 m/sec * 1 m/sec = .06 J   OR  ½ * .04 kg *3 m/sec * 3 m/sec = .18 J

When the same input energy produces two quantities of energy it can not be a conserved quantity.

Delburt Phend

I set up the photo gates on the 4 concentric circles experiment. I kept the drive mass at the 35 cm diameter.  This is a light pulley with four radii (lrn fzx axle and wheel). 40 grams at 105 cm diameter is just as easily accelerated as 120 g at 35 cm diameter; but the energy is three times higher. The gate trip times are the same for the 40 grams at the 105 cm diameter as they are for the 120 g at the 35 cm diameter.

Larger radius differences can be used for larger energy production. You could use 30 to 1.

And I hope we can imagine this being 40 metric tons rather than 40 g.

And we have the 'cylinder and spheres' to secure motion from the apparatus.  Times   times    times:    huge huge and huge