I have working idea for 6000$ usd

[ARMCORTEX]

Who is scared to lose 5k besides a not so rich or a scared guy?

Whats this then...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NOs7zeQnIM

I want this guy, somebody get me this guy.

[ARMCORTEX]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMseCkFOPEc&list=PLvzT_VQykbfU8kJfEDTtdAhC8_ml5j4Sg

Somebody get me this lunatic Brad Booth.

Now that is a good business partner

I could use a guy like that, I hear these guys like startups... I got just the right kind or high risk high reward gamble for this guy.

Half the time these guys just get scammed anyways, whats the difference between deliberate scamming and honest attempt?

[ARMCORTEX]

Yeah Smoky...I see you see .

But you are not the only one to see. I know for a fact ( ok I say high probability) that a little weasel is attempting to steal my idea as we speak to verify the validity and even patent outright.

I need to hurry up to make sure he does not steal from me.

Me I don't care about patent, but if somebody try to patent my idea and claim it's his then you can be dam sure I wanna patent. This is the joy I feel when I see a cracker steal old granny's purse then trip him and the police come, priceless moment.

I am at a disadvantage, that's why I say to people.. Never be poor, if you are poor you can't build stuff.

[TinselKoala]

What part, I wonder, of OPEN SOURCE do you not understand?

[Temporal Visitor]

Ok Mr. Lawrence

You definitely have my attention
Twice per rotation, per crank, 100% of the tension force
of the rotating mass is applied parallel to the direction of
the crankshaft. (Milkovic Oscillating Fulcrum?)

Tandem two-stroke engines, using angular momentum instead
of a combustible fuel. Like reversing the gears on a grandfather clock
so two weights lift the 3rd and maintain the pendulum, extending the
runtime ^3rd. But unlike the pendulum, your model utilizes 360-degree
rotation, The force does not undergo Milkovic degradation. Rather, the center
of rotation moves as a whole, presenting no negative torque on the rotating
masses. (Chaos pendulum)

Newton's first and 3rd laws.
The larger the rotating masses, the more drive torque on the larger wheel.
I don't know about "ou" without physically testing this, but it definitely appears
to outperform a conventional worm-gear.
It's kind of like a play on the counterweight mechanism inside an electric drill.
Or an advancement rather

The true test would be done with one wheel.
One pair of rotating-crankers, 90-degrees apart.
and I would improve upon the crankshaft mechanism
giving it a more elliptical path rather than a circular one.

Even in only two dimensions, this could revolutionize the way we handle
large scale machinery and construction equipment.
Not to mention its' applications in the energy industry or transportation.

Really in the entire manner in which we convert torque into motive force.
And vice versa.
Some degree of input is needed to bring the masses up to speed
and to maintain the rotation, but that is (or can be in the right situations)
irrespective of the torque applied to a secondary wheel or actuator.

Another view of the same underlying principle I published as a GIFT in 2013 can be found here:
http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/wpimages/wpc46ae8b1_06.png

That link is found on the "EVIDENCE" page and was given in addition to the written description which
describes another opposite method - of many very simple ways I found/see that can and do WORK.

There are far better ways, with less parts already built and tested.