Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Simple Experiment: Extraction of Energy from Permanent Magnets

Started by dieter, March 13, 2017, 10:48:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

That is the real simple experiment.  Prove it to yourselves that the stronger magnet has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the coil jumps father when the strong magnet is in place.  The challenge is to determine where the electrical pulse energy goes.  The electrical pulse energy becomes resistive dissipative energy and kinetic energy.  What is the split between resistive and dissipative energy for the case of the weak magnet, and for the case of the strong magnet?  That is the real measurement that you must make and then you plug your numbers into the formula to see if it all checks out.

MileHigh

For the sake of completeness, there is one final unaddressed issue for the hard core measurement crowd.  What happens at the end of the pulse?  Is there still current flowing through the coil at the instant the pulse ends?  That means that some of the initial pulse energy is still sitting in the coil.  It also depends on the nature of the pulse driver circuit.  So that energy may need to accounted for also, but I left it out of the discussion for the sake of simplicity.

seychelles

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN . IS AN ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH A PM STATOR MORE
EFFICIENT THAT ONE WITH ELECTROMAGNET STATOR?
IS AN ALTERNATOR WITH A PM ROTOR MORE EFFICIENT THAN ONE WITH AN
ELECTROMAGNET ROTOR THE ANSWER TO BOTH IS YEEEES..SO WHAT MAKES BOTH
MORE EFFICIENT? PERMANENT MAGNET.WHY? BECAUSE IT IS A SOLID STATE ETHER RESONATOR .
AND MICROM LOW YOU CAN NOT ANALOGIES GLUE WITH MAGNETIC FIELD FORCE.. YOU LEADING
US UP THE GARDEN PATH WITH THAT..

forest

Richard Willis device is all about extracting useful energy from magnet the same way. Look for the older pictures of prototype
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqDS8QQ_9Z0

citfta

Milehigh, you made the following statement:

Now, it's a mistake to assume that the pulse energy will be the same for the small magnet and for the large magnet.  Chances are the pulse energy will be smaller for the case of the large magnet.

Then in the same post you made this statement:

The conclusion is that the magnets in both cases are as dead as proverbial door nails and all of the energy for both cases was provided by the pulser circuit.

Those two statements appear to me to be contradicting one another.  If the magnets are dead as door nails then why would the pulsing current be different?  And why would the current be less for the more powerful magnet?

Respectfully,
Carroll