The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[synchro1]

Quote from Tinselkoala:

"A negative correlation has nothing to do with "negative Henry" nor does it imply that one or the other of the correlated variables is "negative". By posting what you have posted you reveal that you do not understand correlation or inverse relationships".

Tinselkoala can not find a correlation between the "Inverse Henry" term of magnetic reluctance, and the minus sign that appears before the number on the inductance meter when set to read in Henries. He always couples his misstatements with some kind of personal insult. (He's revealing his stupidity again) to help make his malarkey stick.

[Magluvin]

Im getting tired of threads being trashed to the point of no discussion at all.

Over at OUR they give the ability to have private discussions where only welcome people are invited. It works well with keeping a thread clean. But some say it stifles free speech. 

Well if you owned a corporation and you have weekly business meetings with say 10 top people in the company, you would not allow a group of protesters to come in and run amuck. It would have nothing to do with free speech as everyone has rights and reasons for privacy. And in this case, the business meeting, we are in that same territory. We have better things to do with our time than deal with protestors. If some dont like the private thread ability, too bad, we dont have to tell you anything. The threads can be also read only for others where protestors can have their opposition thread to babble among themselves, and if the private/read only players 'want' and 'need' to go to that alternate thread to have battle, then so beit, I dont care..

I am talking with others about seeing if Stefan can provide the read only and or private threads so that real work is not interrupted, and the protesters can have their venue to say what they want to say without it being disruptive in the 'work' threads. If it is a private thread and something comes of value from it, then all persons involved in that thread should take a vote as to open a new thread that shows the progress, but have it as read only, where yet again, protestors can have their own rebuttal and abuse delivery threads, fine, sure, go ahead.  So just like a family talking privately at home, all the way to a top gov meeting, we are all entitled to privacy at times, and I do not see that to be a problem in having that here if we want.  If some do not like that idea, then they must not like the idea of having PM abilities, of which is private. So what would be the issue in having private threads when really we could have completely private talks just like a thread in pm, but a thread is just better for many reasons.

Mags

[synchro1]

Im getting tired of threads being trashed to the point of no discussion at all.

Over at OUR they give the ability to have private discussions where only welcome people are invited. It works well with keeping a thread clean. But some say it stifles free speech. 

Well if you owned a corporation and you have weekly business meetings with say 10 top people in the company, you would not allow a group of protesters to come in and run amuck. It would have nothing to do with free speech as everyone has rights and reasons for privacy. And in this case, the business meeting, we are in that same territory. We have better things to do with our time than deal with protestors. If some dont like the private thread ability, too bad, we dont have to tell you anything. The threads can be also read only for others where protestors can have their opposition thread to babble among themselves, and if the private/read only players 'want' and 'need' to go to that alternate thread to have battle, then so beit, I dont care..

I am talking with others about seeing if Stefan can provide the read only and or private threads so that real work is not interrupted, and the protesters can have their venue to say what they want to say without it being disruptive in the 'work' threads. If it is a private thread and something comes of value from it, then all persons involved in that thread should take a vote as to open a new thread that shows the progress, but have it as read only, where yet again, protestors can have their own rebuttal and abuse delivery threads, fine, sure, go ahead.  So just like a family talking privately at home, all the way to a top gov meeting, we are all entitled to privacy at times, and I do not see that to be a problem in having that here if we want.  If some do not like that idea, then they must not like the idea of having PM abilities, of which is private. So what would be the issue in having private threads when really we could have completely private talks just like a thread in pm, but a thread is just better for many reasons.

Mags

@Magluvin,

There are people on this web site, yourself included, who don't understand basic formulas and laws, or choose to twist and misstate them. The rest of us can't accept this level of ignorance coupled with 'High Fashion" technical arguments. It's our duty to expose you as frauds.

[Magluvin]

@Magluvin,

There are people on this web site, yourself included, who don't understand basic formulas and laws, or choose to twist and misstate them. The rest of us can't accept this level of ignorance coupled with 'High Fashion" technical arguments. It's our duty to expose you as frauds.

I approved this post above to reply to it publicly...

First off, it is mostly you who is saying that we dont understand this stuff. I dont see others agreeing with you here, its just you. You are not building anything to show and prove what you know. You just repeat day after day the same thing. What is that? Are you afraid that if you only wrote it once that nobody will see it?  After 50 times, still worried that nobody has noticed you? As for me, I am not sure that all of the laws and ideals are absolutely correct, so I dont hold them all as gold, otherwise it would be just a "move on folks, nothing more to see here' life. If they are, then this site is here just for giggles and wasted time. You are on moderation. And if you keep it up, as I can see every post before approval, I will do all I can to keep you moderated. There really isnt anyone here that I can see in agreement with your daily splatter.

You say there is fraud. You are only posting cut and paste. Woopty doo. Is that all you got? Do you have bench experience of what you declare as truth? If not then you dont have anything but cut and paste then its worth squat. Like reading a book on kung fu then saying you know kung fu. This isnt the matrix.  So you go ahead and keep posting as you wish, nobody is going to see them.

Mags

[Magluvin]

How about having the threads as read only but the OP of the thread can "allow" or "deny" posting on a user or global basis,, this leaving the need for a moderator to remove any unwanted posts.

I think this would keep the intent of an open community in tact and then using PM you can still have the "closed" discussion when needed.

We already have that in moderation mode. Sometimes it is five or more pages a day and if a moderator isnt around, it could take a bit of time to read, think then approve a waiting message.  So for example, you may have posted 2 days ago and are waiting for approval. Well if its approved, it apears right where it was posted, possibly pages back and possibly days later of which the post may not even get read by someone that has already read that section or page and never get noticed.

Like if there is a read only thread with 5 guys, and if you wanted to join, just ask and if your not a bugger you should be able to join. Its not a prissy private club, its just a way to keep important discussion or project threads clean without having to have the 'job' of running the mop every day. Id rather not have that job and the floors wont get dirty if private or read only threads are allowed.

Mags