The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[onepower]

Forest
Where does the energy come from?.

1. Magnetic field is the source of energy - the only problem is the method to use it
2. Magnetic fields are nested
3. Earth magnetic field is dynamic and contain huge amount of energy uniformly spreaded

I came to a different conclusion based on the fact that magnetic fields are produced by moving charges. Therefore all energy must relate directly to the motion of charged particles. I suspect everyone including myself will be proven wrong in the future because charged particles are supposedly made of even smaller particles mostly unknown to us. 

Here is a strange thought, we know 99% of outer space is a perfect vacuum and 99% of inner space is also a perfect vacuum. This is true for several reasons, first we cannot fit an atom inside another atom therefore the space between the Proton-Electrons must be a vacuum. Thus we always find a perfect vacuum in every space wherever particles are not present.

99% of the universe is a perfect vacuum and what we call material/matter a fog of charged particles in perpetual motion within the vacuum. Think about that, the universe is like a very large vacuum tube and everything we call material a plasma of charged particles moving near the speed of light. In this respect we are beings almost entirely made up of energy...we are literally the thing we seek.

As such I have little interest in magnetic fields and they are simply an artifact of what happens when charged particles move. As well, my first working free energy device was based on the premise of inhibiting or removing all magnetic fields. As Viktor Schauberger once said...do the opposite of what everyone else does and you will be on the right track. Which should be obvious and if everyone else is failing we should not be following...

Regards
AC

[onepower]

Stivep

Where is the gain?.

That's like asking Microsoft where is the code or SpaceX where are your plans?. It's intellectual property silly and you will probably never see it. I mean you don't honestly think anyone would just give it to you do you, lol.

I know many people with working technology and most are consulting on the technology or gearing up for production. Hell, you may be able to buy a free energy device off the shelf at Walmart soon.

However as far as someone just giving you the technology I can't see that happening...why would they?.

AC

[stivep]

My question was not related to intellectual property but to  mechanism of energy extraction.
The only way to get more OUT than IN is when  initial energy IN  is  used to release energy from another source
similar to opening valve .
example:
Energy of the  sun is with losses converted to  electrical energy.
- our energy IN was used to make solar panel.

Energy from  the river carried on by the water pipe  is released  by valve on the pipe.
- our energy IN was used to open the valve.

Energy  in process of Energy Extraction from Schumann Waveguide  is transferred to the interface   Earth/Air.
- our energy IN was used to make receiver and tune it according to Dr Corum from Viziv.

So the question still reminds open:
Where the energy  comes from ? .
Where is the gain?.
-in your  romantic comedy  with  science of Energy
You don't need to give me any secrets at all.

Wesley

[forest]

Wesley . Possible sources
1. McFrey theory of atomic transmutation in strong magnetic field
2. Some hidden slow-wave (or Tesla wave) military transmitter (probably located  in Russia or US). Very unlikely, because receiver require sharp tuning
3. Radiant energy
4. Magnetic field from quanta spin of electrons
Personally I vote for 3 and 4, especially when you understand what is radiant energy

[lukaszkwiatkowskii]

Ale zaleciało para-ezoteryką, żadne z powyższych, w stosunku do zwykłej cewki płaskiej różni się jedynie indukcyjnością wzajemną między-zwojową.