The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[Zephir]

like when the whole world was shaken up in 1989 when they announced cold fusion and people thought it was legitimate

And it isn't? Currently (actually in 2006 already) the Fleischman/Pons fusion at palladium is already replicated with 90+% reproducibility. ENEA Fusion labs is professionally equipped and governmentally funded research base, which is subsidized even by Bill Gates. The achieving of reproducibility in cold fusion research just requires the thoroughness and streamlined research effort - after all, like any other advanced human activity. For example the yield of microprocessors in semiconductor industry is often lower than 60% - and yet nobody doubts their existence. Despite these successes no one of mainstream research basis exhibits an interest about this technology, because it would threat their own nuclear and renewable business: from tokamaks over solar cells to batteries.

[MileHigh]

And it isn't? Currently (in 2009 actually) the Fleischman/Pons fusion at palladium is already replicated with 75+% reproducibility. ENEA Fusion labs is professionally equipped and governmentally funded research base, which is subsidized even by Bill Gates.

Yes, about two or three years ago "cold fusion got hot again" and it was covered on the show 60 Minutes.  Now it's back to being nowhere and the most infamous person associated with cold fusion, Rossi, is considered by most to be a fraud.  Defkalion is dead, they just vanished in a vortex of BS.

If cold fusion was real it would be applied and in use today.

[synchro1]

Who can explain why the Tesla series connected bifilar carries twice the "Magnetization Impulse Charge" as the single wire coil of equal inductance?

[Zephir]

Now it's back to being nowhere

But how it could refuse the 90+% reproducibility of ENEA results? Of course, palladium is expensive and Rossi/Defkalion worked with cheaper nickel, which may be more difficult to handle. But it is reliable ground for further research. You cannot get even the tokamak or thorium based energy without investments into research, despite its perfectly feasible. Are you telling me, that the tokamak or thorium energy is not possible, because it's also promised and delayed for decades only? Is the laser fusion impossible just because of recent failure of NIF? If not, why the acceptance logic of cold fusion should be different? The physicists even didn't start to attempt for it seriously (no results published in peer-reviewed journals with compare to NIF / tokamak / thorium research). Why we should expect positive results with zero or even negative attitude, if even the heavily funded research got no usable results yet?

Who can explain why the Tesla series connected bifilar carries twice the "Magnetization Impulse Charge" then the single wire coil of equal inductance?

When every two neighboring wires within pancake bifilar coil cancel their magnetism each other, then you indeed must exert more energy for achieving the same magnetization at certain distance from them. If this answer doesn't satisfy you, then how the "Magnetization Impulse Charge" is actually defined (circuit diagram, specification of experiments, oscillograms)? We can attempt for explanation only the problems, which are well defined. The vaguely defined problems can get vague answers only.

[synchro1]

But how it could refuse the 90+% reproducibility of ENEA results? Of course, palladium is expensive and Rossi/Defkalion worked with cheaper nickel, which may be more difficult to handle. But it is reliable ground for further research. You cannot get even the tokamak or thorium based energy without investments into research, despite its perfectly feasible. Are you telling me, that the tokamak or thorium energy is not possible, because it's also promised for decades only? If not, why the acceptance logic of cold fusion should be different? The physicists even didn't attempt for it seriously.

What does this have to do with the thread topic?