The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[starcruiser]

Time for remedial Electronics guys?

try this for a refresher
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/rc/rc_1.html

[TinselKoala]

 

Everyone knows zero resistance accross the capacitor electrodes would result in a "Pulse", not a slope. This would appear as a vertical line on the graph.

Wrong again! All real wires have resistance and ALL REAL CAPACITORS do too. Look up "ESR" wrt capacitors. For this claim of yours to be true you would have to have a capacitor with zero resistance and a connection with zero resistance, both impossible in reality, and the current on charge and discharge would be _infinite_, taking no time, which is what a vertical line means. Infinite slope! A change in charge over +no change in time+ !!!! Ridiculous on the face of it, as everyone _actually_ knows.

Good luck with that.

Anyone with a scope and the wit to use it can prove you wrong in fifteen minutes.

You want to keep moving goalposts and constructing your strawman arguments instead of admitting that you were wrong, go ahead. You'll wind up here just like you wound up at EF: nobody pays attention to you since they all know that you are full of yourself, you misrepresent and misunderstand and prevaricate, and you will never admit that you are wrong.

[TinselKoala]

Time for remedial Electronics guys?

try this for a refresher
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/rc/rc_1.html

Perhaps you would like to try to explain to Synchro just where the maximum charge RATE and the maximum discharge RATE are shown on that graph.

Do you believe this very clear and unambiguous statement that he made is correct, or not?

Discharging a capacitor is like decanting water from a five gallon jug; Slow starting, followed by a strong gush  at .67, tapering off to a slow flow: Charging exactly the reverse, max charge rate at .33 capacity:

[synchro1]

Perhaps you would like to try to explain to Synchro just where the maximum charge RATE and the maximum discharge RATE are shown on that graph.

Do you believe this very clear and unambiguous statement that he made is correct, or not?

Why and the hell do you keep reposting that comment when I made it clear that it was an attempt by me to compare the charge and discharge curves as equal and opposite and nothing more?

You're a compulsive psychopath and need help.

[TinselKoala]

SO when you say, "the max charge rate is at .33 capacity" you didn't actually _mean_ that the maximum charge rate is at .33 capacity? Or when you say "slow starting followed by a gush at .67" you didn't actually _mean_ slow starting or that there is a gush at .67?

I see. Well, you will have to excuse me for misunderstanding then, since I can only go by what you SAY, not what you claim to have meant.

(insert facepalm character here)