The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[synchro1]

@Citfa,

You started this problem with me over a year and a half ago when Whoppyjump asked for an explanation of "Flyback". I explained to him back then that positive current goes into the coil, then when the input current's interrupted, the magnetic field collapses and negative current goes out.

You contacted Stephan in Berlin and asked him to lock the thread down. Now just what in the hell is your problem? What is it that you fail to understand about my explanation? Why is it impossible for you to comprehend that?

You advanced your totally preposterous theory that "Negative Current" is imaginary. That's why you're constantly berated by me!

[synchro1]

@Tinselkoala,

You refer to the X,Y coordinate discharge graph as "Differential Calculus". The graph would need a third Z axis to qualify. That's you trying to sound too smart.

[synchro1]

The "1 Ampere Hour" is defined as at 1 volt therefore it's equal to one "Watt Hour". A six volt battery, discharging into the inductor over 10 minutes would require 1 ampere of current to deliver 6 watts. That's a lot of power to run into an inductor. A Henry is a large value like a Farad, and a Tesla of magnetic flux density is a very powerful magnetic force. These factors would come into play in the industrial sector. Laboratory coils usually measure in the Micro-Henries and would use the Oersted for the magnetic force measurement and the coulomb for the input power.

These factors are essential for electronics engineers who design T.V.'s, and especially to calculate Hi-voltage discharges from "Flyback" transformers.

[TinselKoala]

@Tinselkoala,

You refer to the X,Y coordinate discharge graph as "Differential Calculus". The graph would need a third Z axis to qualify. That's you trying to sound too smart.

You just keep coming up with new howlers, in addition to misrepresenting what I "refer" to. See this? d(quantity)/dt, a differential, the change in a quantity over a change in time, or the SLOPE of a quantity/time graph, or to put it in one simple word of four letters, a RATE at which the QUANTITY changes.

In mathematics, differential calculus is a subfield of calculus concerned with the study of the rates at which quantities change.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_calculus

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/Tangent_to_a_curve.svg/200px-Tangent_to_a_curve.svg.png

[TinselKoala]

The "1 Ampere Hour" is defined as at 1 volt therefore it's equal to one "Watt Hour".

NO, it ISN'T.  The Ampere-Hour is a measure of CHARGE and is not "defined as at 1 volt".  The Ampere is 1 Coulomb per second, and one hour is 3600 seconds, so the Ampere-Hour is 3600 COULOMBS of CHARGE. Where do you see VOLTS in that definition? Nowhere except in your mind.

The Watt-Hour is a measure of ENERGY. The Watt is 1 Joule per second, and one hour is 3600 seconds, so the Watt-hour is 3600 JOULES of ENERGY.

The JOULE is NOT EQUAL to the COULOMB.The Ampere-Hour IS NOT EQUAL to one WATT-HOUR. CHARGE is not ENERGY, Division is not Multiplication.  I know you flunked calculus and physics; did you flunk basic algebra as well?

You should at least try googling BEFORE you make silly posts.

A six volt battery, discharging into the inductor over 10 minutes would require 1 ampere of current to deliver 6 watts. That's a lot of power to run into an inductor. A Henry is a large value like a Farad, and a Tesla of magnetic flux density is a very powerful magnetic force. These factors would come into play in the industrial sector. Laboratory coils usually measure in the Micro-Henries and would use the Oersted for the magnetic force measurement and the coulomb for the input power.

These factors are essential for electronics engineers who design T.V.'s, and especially to calculate Hi-voltage discharges from "Flyback" transformers.

Once again you are making no sense. "Laboratory Coils" could be of any inductance value at all depending on their purpose, six watts is not "a lot of power to run into an inductor", the Coulomb is not a measure of power, the Oersted is not a measure of force it is the unit of the magnetic quantity H, it is in units of Ampere/meter, and EEs who design TVs would be laughing their guts out to read your string of nonsense posts.