The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[synchro1]

We can calculate for Ohms with sufficient facts, or measure for them with a DMM.

Same goes for Reluctance. We can calculate for "Inverse Henries" or measure for them with an "Inductance Meter". "Inverse Henries" and "Negative Henries" are both measures of inductor field strength. The stronger the inductor magnetic field, the more it resists a change in current.

Remember: A negative corollary has an inverse relationship between two variables.

Every "B" field stores a tiny amount of electric power in an "H" field. The "H" field is directly proportional to the strength of the "B" field. The inductance meter measures the "H" field and converts the measurement into "Negative Henries" which in turn can be factored into the "B" field strength in Teslas and Gauss.

Milehigh and Tinselkoala couldn't answer specific questions about the amount of power it would require to generate 1 Tesla of magnetic force in an inductor of 1 Henry of inductance. Ramset alleged that they're just trying to help me out; It could be that they're just that ignorant.

[Dog-One]

Simplicity is sometimes kind of nice to have, so I'll make it simple...

Your cargo travels in the train right?   Not the railroad tracks.

Then why try to push your energy down the wires?  Wouldn't it make
more sense to just use the wires as a guide and let the energy
follow those wires instead of try to go through them?

[Magluvin]

Let me see if this makes sense.

MH states that if you use and view the bifi coil in the usual way you will only see what we already know and understand.
this I agree with,, the same old is after all the same old.

MH has asked what makes the bifi not normal, but then frames the question with the usual way of looking at these kind of things.

Others are stating that if you look at the bifi in a "new" way that you will see "new" things.

A question that has come up is why run the bifi at resonance?

Then a question to MH,, what makes resonance so wonderful?

IMHO it is only good for storing energy and or making a nice timing device,, that is when used in the normal fashion.

These questions seem reasonable,, and maybe MH should actually try and answer them instead of only repeating the customary view,, what new views can you come up with MH?

Just some dumb questions to spur the imagination,,
what would happen if you charged the dielectric and then placed it between 2 plates?
what would the condition of the plates be after you did something with the charged dielectric?

Not saying these questions have anything to do with anything,, but sometimes thinking about something else stimulates the old noggin into action.

"These questions seem reasonable,, and maybe MH should actually try and answer them instead of only repeating the customary view,, what new views can you come up with MH?"

Exactly. His stance has most always been that there is nothing more to see beyond what is written as laws or the forced equations that are given to us.  He will not look any further than that. And presses that on others when they try. Its all over these pages not just in this thread alone.

This place is really here for discovering something that may be there and it just hasnt been accomplished yet. OR it has been accomplished, and in many ways possibly, and it is being hidden and ones that come close are trashed into nowhere land. Its one or the other, isnt it?    lol    50 50 chance

To force the books on every "new idea"? Id think most people are not here to get an associate degree like in the box schools. If the idea claims to go beyond the books, then THAT is what people are looking for here .  This site is here to look beyond what we know and or what is 'not known yet, otherwise MH would be correct in much earlier statements that this place is for people to learn electronics,/etc.... If that IS what this place is all about, for reals, then there are a huge chunk of members and readers at the wrong site. Ya know?

Like ask him if there is anything left to learn about pulse motors. Anything?  He will say no. Has made the statements. His words. Do you believe that statement to be 'fact'?

Mags

[nelsonrochaa]

What you are saying makes no sense.  Transformers use ferrite cores so that their power density is high and therefore they can be made in small sizes.  The ferrite core also retains the magnetic field internal to the transformer itself.  Without a ferrite core the transformer would have to be much larger and it would radiate a magnetic field in the vicinity of the transformer which would disturb other components with undesirable magnetic induction effects happening everywhere.  Even if you do not make use of an iron core, you would not make a transformer in the form of a Tesla bifilar pancake coil, you would make a regular transformer in some sort of solenoid configuration without a series bifilar winding.

We are still waiting for some actual application for a Tesla bifilar pancake coil and so far there is none that I am aware of.

To me what does not make sense is you think that i don't know what is the difference between a transformer with iron core and ferrite core .
Are you trying to ridicule me? Hope not because seems to me very poor attempt on your part, and if you don't want answer what i ask it's ok to me, but don't fall in the ridicule of try teach something so basic like you did about the transformers theme .
Get some sun man .

Nelson Rocha

[Magluvin]

Try this....


Two "plates" separated by dielectric is a cap.....right....not a question....


Why then is it so damn difficult to see that the bifilar coil as two small cross section plates separated by dielectric?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?  Stop focusing on the connection between the two "plates" and focus on the obvious, specifically, you are literally looking at two parallel plates (inductors in this case) separated by dielectric...


What MH thinks is immaterial....what anyone thinks is immaterial...we must consider the obvious, that which is right in your damn face, screaming at you....  If you can't see the painfully obvious, slowly step away from the bench, with your hands raised above your head.....  turn away from the bench, leave the room, do not forget to turn off the light, and never return to your lab again.

Right. Nice depiction in characters. So we have the series caps from input to input but, we have the advantage of the unique increase in plate to plate voltage as compared to a single wire coil.  And what if we were able to operate the coil a certain way, is there a way to apply input then take it away and see that half input voltage charge times the number of turns , or as you correctly say, plates? 100v in, 50v between plates times 100 turns. 5kv.  I really cant see that anyone would think it cant be as I say. Im just goin with what Im seein in my jelly ball above my neck. Maybe your direction with it is different. But thanks for that nice contribution. It all shows that the bifi is a different monster in possibly more than one way. We continue on.

Mags