Mervace Working Magnetic motor using induction feedback

[Dingus Mungus]

@ Mramos

You need look in to replicating the linnard patent experiment 13. Hydrogen on demand is here and I believe it is a overunity system because the chemistry is endothermic in nature, which means it uses more heat then it produces. A chemist known here as resin rat has been working on this theory already, but I will be working on this with the use of a fuel cell soon. Then I can determine the exact power havested and if it is enough to reduce the anode and provide useful power at the same time.

@ Merv

I hope to find the schematics to replicate you motor one day, I would love to put one in my server room at the office as a conversation piece. Have you considered using linear audio amps powered by the the same RF they amplify? I would think a four antena array collecting different frequencies could allow for a vast inprovement. Lots of active frequencies in our busy world... I live in tempe and I cant go any where without hitting wifi hotspots (2.4GHz) everywhere. Cellphone frequencies? 60hz? http://www.csgnetwork.com/tvfreqtable.html We're surrounded by it...

Congrats on the invention though. It really is much more then a exectutive ball clicker, but only if you can tune it to run without your brodcast... Why not try a EMF spike thats everywhere? Good luck on your current works.

~Dingus

[Merv]

.Hello again. I have just found the omnibus thread totaling 3000 + replies. Where have I been all this time? This is so much fun. But guess what .The thread is hosted  by the STEORN  Dublin guys. This all makes sence now. I am convinced Finsruds machine in genuine No electro magnets etc. This machine demonstrates an over unity of more than 1000000 to 1. In Financial terms at least. That?s why no one will replicate it .the STEORN machine does not have to be proven or tested now..... It just is ?. it Exists   .It generates its overunity  by public interest and media hype. Surley the STEORN promotion video showing  a stepper motor turning a wheel for half a rev must have been a shot from inside their office photocopy machine or was it something else.
I hope you reply to me Omnibus.
The main problem with my machine was poor marketing 15 years ago. Can anyone here help with that now? Why persue Free energy . Real Energy is cheap, until the oil runs out. I still think Finsruds machine is running on some form of dark energy? Its in a basement after all.

[sparksrus]

>Why persue Free energy . Real Energy is cheap, until the oil runs >out


i think you just answered that question yourself


>I have just found the omnibus thread totaling 3000 + replies. >Where have I been all this time? This is so much fun. But guess >what .The thread is hosted  by the STEORN  Dublin guys

which thread?

Cliff,

[Omnibus]

@Merv,

No offense, but the main problem with your machine is that it doesn?t perform the way not few of us expected it to. What most people here expected was to see a self-sustaining machine working at the expense of its own created energy, independent of external energy input.

The basis for the above expectations is that it has already been proven beyond doubt that excess energy can be created and that the principle of conservation of energy can be violated. SMOT does that even when not in a closed loop. A probable example of a working closed loop SMOT is Finsrud?s machine. Unfortunately, Finsrud is uncooperative and there are still some questions remaining regarding its reality as a perpetuum mobile. Note, however, that even if ultimately Finsrud?s machine is proven trivial (not likely) it won?t disprove the violation of the principle by SMOT.

Many of us hoped that your device is another genuine example of a self-sustaining machine whereby the sticky spot problem seemed resolved in quite original a manner. Now that we know your machine is trivial I don?t see at this point what do you expect from it in terms of marketing. Indeed, it can be produced as some kind of an amusement toy but it won?t have the significance many of us expected it to have.

[tao]

@Merv,

No offense, but the main problem with your machine is that it doesn?t perform the way not few of us expected it to. What most people here expected was to see a self-sustaining machine working at the expense of its own created energy, independent of external energy input.

The basis for the above expectations is that it has already been proven beyond doubt that excess energy can be created and that the principle of conservation of energy can be violated. SMOT does that even when not in a closed loop. A probable example of a working closed loop SMOT is Finsrud?s machine. Unfortunately, Finsrud is uncooperative and there are still some questions remaining regarding its reality as a perpetuum mobile. Note, however, that even if ultimately Finsrud?s machine is proven trivial (not likely) it won?t disprove the violation of the principle by SMOT.

Many of us hoped that your device is another genuine example of a self-sustaining machine whereby the sticky spot problem seemed resolved in quite original a manner. Now that we know your machine is trivial I don?t see at this point what do you expect from it in terms of marketing. Indeed, it can be produced as some kind of an amusement toy but it won?t have the significance many of us expected it to have.

Indeed, I second everything that Omnibus is saying...

Had your device actually used the cadaceus-like 'gimmick' cap in accord with the moving magnet to create a stress-type-potential that could charge the cap, THAT would be something...

Once I learned that you designed it to operate on radio waves, I, and I am sure 95% of us here, instantly 'tuned' off your device and moved on. Using a man made radio wave and capturing its minute wattage in a cap to run your device is INTERESTING, but it certainly isn't EXCITING or WORTHWHILE for the people doing EXTENSIVE research into non-man-made OU...

Had you powered it off cosmic waves, THAT would also be something, but it seems that isn't the case. Boiling your device down to what the KEY mechanism for OU is/was, we ONLY see a pickup in the form of a crystal type radio device that uses man-made radio waves, NOT exactly what the afforementioned people are looking for...

Wish you would have not hid the radio wave part of your device in your first video, could have saved 10 bucks...............