Witness the Free Energy effect

[Theoretical Research]

PLEASE can you make a video of the effect?  (1 volt changing without any amplifier due to change of device position)
also, IF I shoot a charged HV capacitor from cannon and if this cap flies through a coil, would any current be induced?

Regarding your other questions. Yes, sure, a charged cap flying through a coil would induce a voltage on the coil.

A video? Here's an old video I uploaded on youtube for myself on Feb 28, 2016. It's unlisted on youtube and was never intended to be made public.
I might take a short video of the 3rd design for personal reasons and post the unlisted link here, but I'd like to build and publish design 4, an air core design.

My 1st design
https://youtu.be/1jjn-GhG5es

The DVM in the video was in millivolts. The op-amp gain was 10,000. The exact part #s, including the Metglas magnetic core part # and circuit, were published on another site, but I removed it because the design is no longer supported due to the discovery of what I've referred to as the colossal space flow voltage effect. The reason I started making these experiments is to attempt to understand what's happening. Back then I theorized gravity was caused by the acceleration of space toward Earth and was moving at ~ 11.2 km/s at the surface. I also came up with the 1st equation, which was based on charge in the capacitor foil that was within the magnetic core producing a magnetic field due to the charge moving through space. If the charge was oscillating between + and -, then I hoped this would produce an oscillating magnetic field in the magnetic core. Well, the device that I built based on the equations worked. Some very smart people who claimed to have undisclosed science & technology that I could only describe as what one would see in the Star Trek movies answered a lot of my questions about my experiment and theory. BTW, on numerous occasions these people have given me physical evidence of their existence. They said that space is not accelerating on Earth like I've theorized. They said charged particles in my device would not cause produce a measurable magnetic field in the core due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. They said space does flow on Earth, and that the intrinsic spin of particles such as electrons produce a vortex of spinning space, but due to certain properties, e.g., space is attracted to mass (simply stated), and therefore space doesn't flow the exact path of the magnetic field. Anyhow, while designing a space propulsion system I discovered that the propulsion device was nearly identical to the device seen in the above video with the exception of electrical current. The old designs, 1 & 2, were based on equation #1 that did not require current to produce the effect. The space propulsion device was based on a new equation, equation #2, which also predicted the experimental results. Basically, the two equations are related. Equation #1 is based on magnetic fields while the equation #2 is based on electric fields. Equation #1 did not require a moving charge, relatively speaking. Equation #2 requires moving charge. And that is the precise reason my 2nd device, the single frequency design, did not work unless there was some external source that would cause current in the coil, including thermal Johnson noise. I did too well of a job in the 2nd design to prevent current. And so design 3 is the complete opposite. It produces a good amount of current in the coil. Albeit the circuit is easily improved. The pulses are way too short for my MOSFETs, ~ 300ns off & 400ns on, which causes heating. I should buy some appropriate MOSFETs. There are no plans to fiddle with design 3. It worked great, but it would probably help to increase the pulse width, and then adjust other areas of the circuit. Who knows. The space flow effect might produce a few dozen volts or more.

Anyhow, that's getting into theory, which I don't want to talk about in this thread. So that's a video of design 1. There's a small chance, maybe 20%, that I'll post a video of design 3.

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

Theoretical Research thank you for the video, well done! but I don't quite understand why core become magnetized... sure, the charge in motion produces magnetic field but the problem is that the magnetic core is moving with charged plates and observer and entire planet. The Rowland disk experiment demonstrate this: to detect magnetic field compass has to be stationary when charged disk is spinning.


https://www.edumedia-sciences.com/en/media/108-rowlands-disk

[Theoretical Research]

I'll try to go over the math one of these days in a thread dedicated to that. The effect is based on the permittivity of the vacuum.

[Theoretical Research]

I'll just briefly go over the math and mechanics here.

To understand the mechanics we need to look at what's happening inside dielectric material. When a voltage in a capacitor such as mylar is applied to the two plates an electric field is formed that causes the electrons in the mylar to move closer to the positive plate. Since the mylar is an electrical insulator, the electrons don't move far, but there are a lot of them. While the E-field is changing the electrons in the mylar are moving toward one of the plates, which equates to electrical current. You can test this by placing small particles in a container of water along with a strong magnet and some metal plates on the outside of the container. With the aid of a microscope you can see the particles moving with a high voltage spike. If the B-field is aligned east/west and the capacitor plates are facing north/east, then the small particles in the dielectric medium will move up/down.

So now we know that alternating E-field in a dielectric medium causes alternating current in the dielectric medium. Initially one might think that if we remove all of the dielectric medium that there will no longer be electrical current, but what about the vacuum? The vacuum has a dielectric constant, permittivity. I'm claiming there's real electrical current between two metal plates inside a vacuum when AC is applied to the metal plates.

If we apply a magnetic field perpendicular to the current, we have a force. Such a device makes a valid space propulsion system. As an example, let's say we have car in motion. That's KE, kinetic energy. We could build a device that converts some of that KE into a battery. Such a device would need to apply a force on the car in the opposite direction the car is moving. Now let's say Earth is causing space to flowing up at a certain location. If we place our space propulsion device at that location such that the space propulsion force is down, the device gains energy.

Some equations:

F=B*I*L
P=F*v
P=(B*I*L)*v
P=V*I
V=P/I
V=((B*I*L)*v)/I=B*L*v
P=(B*L*v)*I

F is force, newtons
B is magnetic field, tesla
I is current, amps
L is length, meters
P is power, watts
v is velocity, m/s
V is voltage

Example, our core is producing 40 mT rms, distance between the copper plates is 0.02 m, effective space flow velocity through the device is 2 Km/s, and the current (AC) through the copper plates is 10 A rms. The free power would therefore be P = B*L*v*I = 40e-3 T * 0.02 m * 2000 m/s * 10 A = 16 watts.

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

Theoretical Research please can you explain a little more because I still don't get it.

Is vacuum suppose to be in between plates or a magnetic core?

Applying magnetic field perpendicular to the current inside dielectric?  this magnetic field comes from permanent magnet? are you talking about Lorentz force?

So what pushes against space flow? magnetic field from magnet? what is the role of current inside vacuum/dielectric?