THE RANT ROOM

[SolarLab]

Regarding investment in Holcomb. Due diligence, recommended. I was able to find in the public record that the doctor was fined $4,000,000 for selling patents he didn't own, as well as other unsavory business dealings. With his record, why would anyone trust him with a nickel?
bi

Any links or other factual information - would like to check before committing...

Thanks

[bistander]

From Google:

https://www.nashvillepost.com/home/legal-dispute-over-holcomb-intellectual-property-expands/article_2afcce0f-8ac1-5240-b7fb-afd4444ce1e4.html

https://casetext.com/case/in-re-holcomb-health-care-services

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/tn-court-of-appeals/1493881.html

https://www.wistech.org/2004/12/judge_rules_inv.html
($4mil)

bi

[rakarskiy]

For early investors! There will be no quick money from this project, there are very significant integration risks, including from opposition, already from existing players in the energy market. If your education and experience are not enough to evaluate this position, I can only sympathize with you.

HES is not ready for mass production, the fact that they have converters up to 50 kW, with specific operation, does not mean that they have converters above 100 kW, ready to be integrated into the power grid. They have only recently announced the development of a 200 kW converter (which will take time to develop and finalize).

When Holocombe received the patent, he probably made an agreement with the "energy control system" to promote inverters of at least 100 kW, which was an oversight, since he does not yet have a proven system for such power.   Unless you pair several, which is an additional risk in the harmonization of the individual systems.  I hope they solve this technical problem.

The position on the lawsuit has already been voiced for more than a month and hangs in limbo, what kind of maneuver it is, it's hard to say, but in my opinion it's a kind of leverage on HES, so I will not rush to conclusions.

The НES system is absolutely workable, probably by mass-size parameters (W/kg) of the generator itself may be inferior to mechanical generators, but in comparison with the general characteristics of, for example, mechanical motor/generator converter clearly wins. Linear converter of Holcomb should be compared with linear converter of Motor/generator, then all positions of comparison will be provided. Again, Holcomb does not have a 100 kW converter yet. 

For example a motor/generator for the grid is interesting from 1 MW and Holcomb does not yet have a proven 0.1 MW system.
If I were Holcomb, I would focus my efforts on an electromechanical converter to achieve a power output of 0.5 MW or more (he has such a project, with a stated COP-4.0).

The problem with the Holcomb standalone generator is all positioning due to the uniqueness of the technology. The latter positioning in its promotional messages only indicates the ambiguity of further developments and controversies with this system. In my opinion this is exactly the kind of system that is interesting 10-25-50kW off-grid generators. But the system of existing energy, they are not interesting in free access to the consumer. Therefore, everything will be done to prevent the development of this generator.


________________________________________________
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html

[SolarLab]

From Google:

https://www.nashvillepost.com/home/legal-dispute-over-holcomb-intellectual-property-expands/article_2afcce0f-8ac1-5240-b7fb-afd4444ce1e4.html

https://casetext.com/case/in-re-holcomb-health-care-services

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/tn-court-of-appeals/1493881.html

https://www.wistech.org/2004/12/judge_rules_inv.html
($4mil)

bi

Hey Bi,

Thanks! Good information, enlightening a worst!

Lots of info about Dr. Holcomb - now I can see why he's interested in
world health - his attempts at "non profit" go back a ways.

Also nice that he already knows his way within the system. At this
stage it's probably very helpful -  makes me feel more confident in
his abilities - he's no neophite in that respect and should be able to
navigate the tough (free energy) waters ahead.

He's also probably learned not to fight the University (government).

I'm not on anyones side (except myself, of course) but I don't find this
lawsuit that incriminating - more like a pissing contest between a bunch
of academics who want to own the technology, and the money; even
though the documents all admit that Holcomb was the inventor.

You know I still hesitate to by a Chrysler after they stole the "Delayed
Winshield Wiper" patent - they even made a movie about it  !
But buying a Jeep, no problem. 

Again, thanks - intersting stuff! Have a good one...

Not technical I know, but then again, this is a "Rant" topic!

SL

[bistander]

How many times did you see mention of proven fraud on Holcomb's part? I saw many. Once a liar, ..... Some things never change. Draw your own conclusions. Personally, I didn't need his history to conclude he was full of bs. Just listen to him or read his patents/applications. It amazes me how people fall for it.
bi