THE RANT ROOM

[seychelles]

LANCA SEEING THAT YOU ARE A MULTI BILLIONAIRE, PAY MY TICKET I CAN GO AND GET IT VERIFIED.
I AM A CERTIFIED AUSTRALIAN.

[lancaIV]

Hello seychelles,my family name is Lanca,not Dansie ,and we both are not : billionaer !
Have You,or Mark,not in/near Perth contacting relatives,friends ? At first !
Question,2023 : Development stage ?
This can clearly also becoming asked over their page ,non formal,anonym !
https://www.ggoe.org/pages/1-copy ' CONTACT US '

GGOE is looking for: "Vehicle partners, Drivetrain partners, Manufacturing partners, Distribution partners, and Installation and maintenance partners."

WEG(Brasil),
PT : https://salvadorcaetano.pt/en/       https://www.teixeiraduarte.pt/ 
        https://www.efacec.pt/en/about-us/     

        https://www.edpr.com/pt-pt

TATA foundation(India)

Big enough,international working  and sector related !
Industrial win:win ?
BRIC and Africa ( 4 billions habitants preview) are Renewables ' hungry' !


In future 33- 50% from total electric energy global  will be used for CO2 scrubbing ,we can assume :
450 ppm down to 400 ppm to 350 ppm,during decades  !
https://www.dolder-ing.ch/wissen/Einheiten/Teile-Vielfache/Teile-Vielfache.htm
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=energy+input+per+ton+atmospheric+co2+scrubbing&oq=energy+input+per+ton+atmospheric+co2+scrubbing&aqs=heirloom-srp..
https://www.google.com/search?q=energy+need+for+1+ppm+atmospheric++co2+reduction&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m

With this above given data :

8,8 GJ per captured atmospheric ton CO2
https://www.google.com/search?q=8%2C6+GJ+in+KWh&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m

450 ppm to 350 ppm atmosperic CO2 ppm in tonnes,
1 ppm ~ 7,82 Gtons :

7,82 Gtons( ppm) x 8,6 GJ/ton
~ ( 7,82 x 10⁹ ) x         8,6 GJ     

~  7,82 x 10⁹    x         2,388 MWh
First question :  2,388 MWh/ton versus https://www.scientistswarning.org/2020/06/04/direct-air-capture/
The theoretical minimum energy required to extract CO2 from ambient air is about 250 kWh per tonne of CO2,
16,675 MWh x 10⁹

16,675 GWh x  10⁶

16,675 TWh x  10³

16,675 PWh x  1

Ergo : 16,675 PWh for 1 ppm capture , 1,6675 EWh for 100 ppm atmospheric CO2 capture !

     
Each KWh calculating with 1,0¢ generation costs ( without capture system):

MWh  10 $
GWh   10 000 $
TWh    10 000 000 $
PWh    10 000 000 000 $
EWh     10 000 000 000 000 $

1,6675 EWh divided 100 years reduction 16,67 PWh per year for atmospheric capture
case 250 KWh/ton : 175 PWh divided 100 years reduction 1,75 PWh per year

      1 TW energetic generator parc gives ( 24/365,25) 8,766 PWh

or in GGOE/Holcomb/airpower 20 KW relocateable size : 50 000 000 units

                 ergo  16,75 Trillions $ pure energetic process costs ! How fast the capture to do ?
                 by 250 KWh/ton capture instead 2,388 MWh( or given 8,6 GJ)/ton and 1¢/KWh  :
                 1,77 Trillions $ pure energetic process costs for 100 ppm CO2 capture !
                 Case 2,388 MWh/ton 166,75 Billions $ and case 250 KWh/ton  17,7 Billions $ :
   
                 per year ,100 years program !
                 Doubling : 50 years program !   - 2073
                 
                + CO2 capture system costs

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/24/new-technique-from-us-national-lab-to-remove-co2-at-record-low-cost.html


https://judbarovski.livejournal.com/132407.html?
The said chemistry can use electricity for the second reaction, while another lion share of electricity is consumed for contacting the air with CaO solution in the water. If 80% of the CO2 extraction it needs (1.0 / 0.0004) / 0.8 = 3.1 * 10^3 m3 air/m3 CO2 = 2 *10 ^6 m3/ton CO2 = 1.2 * 2 * 10^6 * 10^5 * P (bars) * 10^(-3) / 3600 = 67,000 *  P(bars) kWh/ton CO2 + for chemistry we uses 1100 kWh/ton CO2. P is the air pressure for mixing the air with the CaO solution. If P = 1000 Pa = 0.01 bars, so totally it is about 1770 kWh electricity/ton CO2, and if 0.001 /0.33 = USD 0.003/kWh electricity, so CO2 of high purity would be USD 5.3 /ton CO2. The more energy effective it, the cheaper CO2 can be.
Here I mean to see a calculation error :

if 0.001 /0.33 = USD 0.003/kWh electricity
0.001 as heat costs ,/ 3  as conversion to electricity '2 from 3 losts' and ? the heatconverter costs !?
Even taking 80% heatelectric converter efficiency and 0,5 ¢/KWh converter costs we get USD 0,00625/KWh




https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/reports/cool-earth
Given these factors, we estimate that Cool Earth reduces greenhouse gas emissions through direct protection of forests at a rate of $1.34 per tonne of CO2-equivalent. Despite the uncertainty which this figure is subject to, we estimate that this figure will be no higher than $1.87/tCO₂eq and no lower than $0.65/tCO₂eq.


                With anymore anthropogenic surplus consume  life CO2 emission ( body breathing out part ,okay!)

Energy consume/use per year,global :
https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/climate-change/energy/global-energy-consumption

Energy is our system ' blood',not our system ' body ' and ' mind' !

                   


wmbr
OCWL
p.s.: clearly,the ' open source' company Tesla Inc.,with a minority share holder from South-Africa,could also         becoming interested for  renewable power-pack energy

[stivep]

CORE SATURATION TIME
An important parameter in the design of the LinGen, Babcock Magnetic Motor, and other devices
that employ Pulse Magnetic circuits is the "Core Saturation Time." This is based on the Pulse
parameters and the Material characteristics (B-H).
//approach - an Analytical calulation  given by Gorchilin

Analytical calulation is given by Gorchilin

Fascination turned into rejection of value especially : Gorchilin  revelations  were mainly rejected by modern science,
even if some brains in Russia manifest  some potential too .
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann in 1989 were losers too but American science didn't lose its value by that.
I dedicated my last 30+ years to  help  the unique community of researchers , to understand where and how to look for Energy for Free ending with my partner
"no" to present  working model fallowed by all kind of his excuses.
He is more tend to trade it for cash today.
His decision may change - he thinks he is still young enough 
_________________________________________________________
I may present the device on my own  with  full respect to protection of his intellectual property rights  .
Personally I'm disappointed with that very much build into human nature egoism often manifested in social platforms
including this one.

especially aggravating is one yelling at me guy :

You had 13 years to prove your device, you promised  to give away  Wesley.

Answer:
12 years ago I visited  Tariel Kapanadze.
~4 years ago I was in Costa Rica   doing tests  with the crew.
~2 years ago my partner ( the  biggest sceptic) decided to  look at the device I've build that didn't work.
~1 year ago I said publicly that he made it work
I never  made promise   to play with someone else intellectual property especially directing it,  to the crowd of unknown to  me individuals.
____________________
Simulation is great tool but it depends on entered data and only practical test can add into more accurate results.
Self powered magnet motors concept is dead. 
Energy conversion using  small energy coupling into another energy source works, - it is  the only
direction  that works saving your time and money for  research.
Kapanadze  didn't understand what is powering his device but he  build it.
Example:
Valve  on the pipe connected to the river water flow opened with use of small energy gives access to another energy source (river)
you can benefit from.

_{useful links:}
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg581009/#msg581009
_{additional useful links}
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg580999/#msg580999
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg581017/#msg581017

Wesley

[kolbacict]

For Wesley,
Patents about wireless energy transfer:

https://patents.google.com/patent/GEP20146089B

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2007008646A2

https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2115239C1/en

Thank you sergh for links
I will  place my comment  after I study the documents.
Wesley

Where ?

[onepower]

stivep

I may present the device on my own  with  full respect to protection of his intellectual property rights  .
Personally I'm disappointed with that very much build into human nature egoism often manifested in social platforms
including this one.

So your intelligent friend is being egotistical because they have serious reservations about the consequences of there actions as it relates to the effects of advanced technology on humanity. Where you imply to not be egotistical by wanting to disclose there technology consequences be damned and in effect take all the credit?... interesting. Do you psychopath much?.

AC