Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Split Flux Transformer

Started by SkyWatcher123, May 11, 2017, 01:28:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

seaad

Hi guys

I have only made some tests with a special H-brige, with extremely low idle current, driving a tuned high voltage transformer.
Mainly for testing my type I + II transformers  with a higher voltage input. The COP remained the same.
After that I have been busy with some house and garden projects.

info here;
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/10394-bi-toroid-transformer-thane-c-heins-22.html?highlight=toroid+seaad

Regards Arne

nul-points

hi seaad

very interesting results with your multicore!

i have an old multicore i made, inspired by the early Jensen design (which was a long time before Thane Heins BiTT)

as you can see from the photo below it has a common winding on the 2 narrower core loops, but i can remove the winding, separate those loops and rewind a primary on each to emulate your design (the core on the left is another, thicker toroid seen from sideways on)

i see that both you (and Jensen) have used AC drive but i'm more familiar with pulse operation, so i think i'll try that first


good luck with your tests, thanks
np
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

lancaIV

Hello seaad,  probably you heared about Heinrich Kunel and his "static magnetic generator",       
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=12&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19820128&CC=DE&NR=3024814A1&KC=A1#

he also wrote about "his device multi-fold cascading" up to MW-output range. Electrical  transformer coupling   how easy/ difficult in financial costs , especially if to include electrity output kind , DC or AC or pulsed AC, ? ----------------You ,seaad,are real experimenter, not only theorist :----------------
So my thinking and this related my question:---------------- transformer overload protection https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current
each electrical device has for some pulse cycles inrush current and /or inrush voltage ,up to 100 times the nominal value,  so how are you/will you treating this short but to overcome barrier,which kind of " bridge/ glider" ? Inrush limiter ? For each cascade/couple  step a battery/ capacitor bank?
https://www.ametherm.com/inrush-current/inverter-inrush-current-protection

seaad

Quote from: lancaIV on December 18, 2018, 09:37:19 AM
Hello seaad,  probably you heared about Heinrich Kunel and his "static magnetic generator",
     
So my thinking and this related my question:-- transformer overload protection https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current
each electrical device has for some pulse cycles inrush current and /or inrush voltage ,up to 100 times the nominal value,

H. Kunel: Yes i have tried that with some gawky experiments. No luck so far.
But I also made many experiments with the split-trafo types without good results first, until suddenly! > 100%. (above my probes, scope uncertainty)
Much of the effect comes from the right core material type (I don't say mine are optimum here)
   See: http://www.energeticforum.com/307037-post642.html
And the core size ratio.

Inrush voltage is not an issue right now. The important thing now is to bring down the need of Kilo-Volt to the primaries.

Regards Arne

lancaIV

I thank you for the answer, but the question was not specific the Kunel-device related( this only stated as example how to treat with great numbers and couplings with several " inrush phase" connections) )  it was and is a geral question:what is the physical and financial cheapest and easiest way to treat this "inrush phase" between couplings in electrical devices ?!f.e.: from a battery to - 1.connection and inrush step - an inverter to - 2. connection inrush step - a motor ......by consumer "no-load up to full load" conditioning!variable " soft drive" arrangement ?-------------------------------------------------------------
https://contest.techbriefs.com/2017/entries/sustainable-technologies/7503-------
frequency ( ~ pressure) and output variation : chaos-butterfly in a shoebox
Do you know about the " windhex/Wind witch" internal  process ? -


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windhexe
Variac?  Air core? Carbon Nano Tube ? Thermionic channel ?let us digitize to solid Voltage,  Amperage and Hertzian swinging/ cycling:one is the winding, the other is the wide( band- width/gap) and the last the fluidum velocity pressure