Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



100 times overunity on a software program

Started by indigo22, August 09, 2017, 03:19:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

antijon

I'm no expert but common sense tells us not use the voltage peak from an inductive spike to calculate wattage.

Indigo22, you need to add a resistor on the secondary to determine real power. As you may not be aware, inductors, including transformers, can have inductive kickback. This phenomenon can produce a very high voltage for a short period of time, but the power released is only equal to the power stored in the inductors magnetic field. Adding a resistor to the secondary should lower the output voltage and give you a more accurate reading of the wattage out.

Of course, if you were smarter you would have known this already.

Void

Electronics circuit simulation programs only work as they have been programmed to work.
They would not likely at all be useful for OU research for the very reason that they
would not have any routines programmed into them which model OU principles. If you use electronics
circuit simulation programs incorrectly, they can give erroneous results, just as when you use actual
physical electrical measuring equipment incorrectly you will get meaningless results. :) Not only do you
have to use measurement equipment correctly, but you must know how to correctly interpret the results.
There are all sorts of people posting to the internet claiming OU when they actually really just don't know
what they are doing and what they are talking about.




indigo22


TinselKoala

QuoteToday's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.

Hilarious! What do you think _you_ are doing, Indigo22, when you set up a _simulator_? How do you think the simulator works, with chopped liver or something? It is nothing more than a system of equations, and your simulated circuit is a structure which has no relation to reality.

The fuzzy photos you have posted don't allow me to see if you are incorrectly using _peak_ voltages and currents in your claim of overunity. Why don't you post the actual multisim file so that more knowledgeable people can examine it for themselves to see what is happening?

Meanwhile, I'll be looking forward to seeing your actual build of the simulated circuit, with real hardware and real measurements.


You may also consider that the entire world around you, including the cellphones you communicate with and the computers we are using to read and post on forums, and run simulators, etc. were designed by engineers working with results of research conducted by real scientists -- using mathematics _properly_ and coming up with results that actually _shape_ our reality.

indigo22

i ya'll think your smarter then please leave this conversation to the big boys, i'm not even gonna comment