Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[popolibero]

Rick,


I'm not asking to show your advanced setup. Maybe I'm not sure where the part of the third stage process you're willing to teach ends and the advanced part starts..


Right now my setup runs from a battery, it has a 555 controlled variable frequency and duty cycle control. Right now I have 500V20A mosfets on it, but have 1000V ones as well. I have two actually, one is a fat 10 filer (awg 18) coil, the smaller one is 4 filler and is the one I'm testing this with. I have fried many components over the years lol. Having a variable duty cycle helps as you can dial up the input power slowly from almost zero while monitoring on the scope. Parts can be checked and measured, this shouldn't be a big problem.


I meant the led lamps you put in the glass of water in the video, what voltage are they rated for?


thanks,
Mario

Mario,
I am doing a video right now and will go over things point by point. But I am not going to discuss other themes/possibilities because that is getting too involved for people. And so far I have no assurance that people are settled on the very first point. You need to fully settle on the first point before trying to figure out the advanced processes. I will enlarge upon the basics now and that will show you what to do after that. It will be self-evident after the aha! moment.
I said that the balance is something you have to always keep in mind and which is for you to figure out. And yes, in a manner of speaking.
No, I am not going to give my advanced process over to you or anyone no matter how much you ask. I have shown what is sufficient for everyone. You will figure out more after you settle on the basics, and then experiment. I will not dispense with the learning by experience process. If people don't do that they will just be dependent upon others.
I don't know if you have a proper solid state SSG. I cannot help anyone remotely or over the internet. And I cannot be assured that your semiconductors are not partly damaged. Which is most likely the case. EVERYONE will do that when they start to do this basic third stage process. So be prepared to have plenty of replacement parts for each controlled experiment. Very very few of you will ever do such controlled experiments because of the time and cost and mostly because you assume your parts are still fine because they still are switching. Some of you may have advanced semiconductor experience and know what I am talking about here. Again, this is why I didn't show even the basic level. Now I have opened the door and when people jump ahead and try this, even before they are settled in the basics (which I have no evidence that most people here have that settled) then they will go back to the basic level and get poor results. I have 15 years of full-time experience helping thousands of people all over the world with exactly this problem. Some people spend over a year with the same damaged parts and don't realize it. Then I visit them and pop in another transistor and presto, everything changes. Not the magic touch but Mr. Fixer  with undamaged parts.
Again, this is why we cannot trust anyone's pictures, videos, or words about claims against FE systems. Because in many cases you have damaged parts.

So I would say that it is a bad idea to start with a solid state setup. Especially I believe you may have said you are powering it with a power supply. And you would want to start with fresh parts anyway.

The cap statement wasn't so specific. It was just said to tell you that no load was on it. It was an incomplete diagram, or just showing an example of a moment in time. And yes, in a tank circuit you can explode the caps.

I don't really get what your last sentences mean exactly.

[rickfriedrich]

You have to get into the real nature of energy, where it comes from? How does it transfer? What is Q really? Many of the whys and hows will never be known in our present existence. We are often left to what happens when you do this or that. The problem with the skeptic is that they demand to know everything about something before they will believe in it. But even Heaviside said something to the effect that he didn't have to understand digestion before he would eat something. So we have to know our limitations. It is interesting that some books define Q vaguely or as some application or whatever. So it is a good question to look at carefully. All of these words and processes are defined in a certain context, so the context is everything. What you go in with is what you will come out with.

Can you also explain in video why Q factor is free energy ? I have my own theory about it, waiting for comments on this topic also. If I could only confirm my theory....everything would be changed...

[AlienGrey]

All if reading some have excessive voltage is a problem then this technigue could indeed help you
How it works, buy cascading HV MosFets.

[tomd]

INTRODUCING THE MORON LEVEL OF COMPREHENSION..taken from the yahoo group


https://energyevo.com/2015/01/18/updated-compilation-of-important-info-don-smith-shared-to-nuenergy-yahoo-group/


However I will argue that Don Smith did not  invent the effect.   It was invented by Carlos Benitez. Benitez stated that when pulsing one plate of a capacitor, the other plate automatically charges up from the ground.( Benitez then switches the ground on and off mechanically creating an energy pump.
To the EE's present who have not been taught correctly  -  it is called "Electrostatic induction"  -  Look it up.
It is usually glossed over as  unimportant.  Nothing to see here -  move on (lol).

I think this is what where talking about. Explained in an easy to understand way. Download the attached document. https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/

[itsu]

Very interesting tests your are performing ITSU.
Now I look forward to a test where you insert the (sweeping) signal to the big coil (serial resonanse) and make signal detecting with the scope or else on the two Satellite coils besides or on top of each other. In the same way as before. Parallel and 10kOhm.
About the puzzling question about the LEDs:
Is that refering maybe to some LEDs voltage threshold level (knee) that you come just above when putting the coils on top of each other?

Regards Arne

I used the same 2 satellite coils as yesterday to check for coupling with the scope but now in series LC configuration.

First i could not find the 193KHz resonance point as it seems to be shifted to 3.5MHz.
I think i measure now the self resonance of the satellite coils, not their series LC resonance point.

After attaching the FG to the yellow coil directly instead of using a 2 loop wire, i now find a resonance "dip"
around the 193KHz on the yellow coil and a broad peak there on the blue coil (plus some resonance peaks around 3.5MHz).

So using the coils either in parallel or series LC configuration makes a lot of difference.

But it still shows that it hardly matters if the coils are coupled horizontally or vertically.


Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2GxHd78tS0



I then used the big coil in series LC (as done always) directly driven from the FG so no gate driver.
We see the same "dip" around 193Khz as in above tests.

The satellite coil was first put into series LC, lateron at parallel LC

We see the same thing as above, in series LC strong resonance peaks around 3.5 - 4MHz and a weaker peak
around 193KHz.

In parallel LC we see only a resonance peak at 193KHz, so to me the parallel LC configuration of the satellite
coils is the preferred one.

Video here:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yES9kJkHFk0


Itsu