Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[AlienGrey]

AG//quote //
But here is just not the place!//end quote
//Things related to the FE community its history [unknown ?] etc etc
are of course important to readers here .
// Chet
Ultimately the most important thing is the truth // especially as it applies to   energy harvesting.

Chet could you or Nick please highlight and point to us the useful technical points of importance you are referring to other wise they appear to be lost in the confusional side tracking issues.


regards AG

[ramset]

I too felt your statement to Broad brush and lacking definition.
and it must be remembered
this is Ricks thread for the moment...
you take him "with his baggage "
or Change the channel .

[AlienGrey]

Is it Ricks channel? indeed well well news travels!
Question for nick, in the newman device Mr newman obviously had a different set up to the window JB device
in that Mr Newman used a 'contact breaker switch interrupter' per revolution. Well to be exact didn't the energy
he spoke of coming from his spinning magnetic pump effect and his contact breaking com/slip ring mechanism
so in effect if one was to replace the ferromagnets with Neo's the effect would me some what spectacular ?
If that is so why don't all your devices exploited this phenomena but use a semiconductor that incurs losses
instead as the short resistance impedance would require about 10 x irf640's in parallel to acquire the correct
impedance however the BEMF might pose a problem, if one did the job correctly and before some one suggests
using an SCR it has a resistance in the 5 ohm region witch makes it useless along with any bipolar device 

PS thanks for the advice.
AG

[rickfriedrich]

I accept you backing out of this. I have dealt here with the fundamental reasons for this forum and the nature of discussing OU itself. Again, I have found no acknowledgement of anything that I have said from most of you while you have responded positively to negative claims. I have provided more demonstrations of my OU claims than anyone in the free energy community and have spent 15 years teaching on the subject in person and on forums. I made a video for you guys because you were discussing my setup here, while I told you that none of that was given with the expectation (title of video also) it was a claim that should be believed without personal experience. But you think you guys would at least say something positive about all this, and grant something. Instead there is a silence or denial and now silencing me. I guess this was to be expected. I'll take it that I went too far in showing you guys the secrets of OU. And that just won't be tolerated.

Rick,
With respect please ease up. you are in some of your text coming across to some of us as attacking our intelligence and almost branding us as idiots. You need to respect that like you, some of us have developed fairly rigid beliefs on this subject. I've already stated my view on how the energiser works and your very long and detailed posts are not going to convince me that I'm wrong. I would not dare posting repeatedly in the same way as you, almost trying to coerce folk by words into my way of thinking. I appreciate that you are sincere and only wish to do good but you must realise that your method of communication tends to raise one's hackles! I'm not saying that you are plain wrong in your understanding, just that through my many years of experimenting with energisers and the like, I have experienced nothing out of convention in regards to its modus-opwerandi. I do not wish to enter into an in depth technical debate with you, as I did with John way back in time, as this would clearly be a futile exercise. You have well and truly stated your case for folk to consider. Now is the time to ease up.

[rickfriedrich]

And yet you ask me questions after this!?!?
We all have baggage in this world. Some of us want to help others reduce their baggage or prevent others from having it. We learn from other people's mistakes.

   With out  prejudice.
I agree Rick does appear to have some 'baggage' problems he 'needs to come to terms with' or sort out for his own good perhaps shut him self of from and move on.
Kind regards AG