Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[gyulasun]

A.king,
would you mind answering the rest of my questions?

G

Cold electricity:  Let us say you light up a 4 watt 12 volt led lightbulb.  Under normal conditions it would heat up.  Even if your voltage was low there should still be a slight heating effect.  That is ordinary or conventional electricity.
When you light up the same bulb using high frequency and/or an earth ground utilising Tesla single wire technology, the bulb lights up cold.
ie no heating effect which should be present.  Secondly it dips in temperature to varying degrees depending upon the circuit. This effect also happens on the RICK (Resonance induction coupler kit) under certain conditions.  It most certainly happens using a Slayer output to bulb and earth ground in a series configuration.

[a.king21]

I did not use any equipment to check the readings. I mention the effect because you cannot prove anything over the internet. It is for others to repeat the experiment and comment.  I am happy it went cold. So replicate it if you can.  That's my message.
I gave the information for free.  I did not have to. Simple as that.

[gyulasun]

Rick,

What is wrong with my being optimistic in this sentence on extra energy:  "I never wrote that obtaining excess energy is not possible at all.  I do have an open mind and I believe that a circuit setup can surely be built which can produce extra energy compared to its input we feed in. So far your setup in question does not seem to produce any extra output."

On your reverse argument with mentioning the law of conversation of energy, I find this interesting you mention this law.

Was it not you who wrote this in your Reply #561:
"So we have at least 8W of measured power with 0.75W or less input." ? 
Is this not an over unity claim? Where is the law of conversation of energy in your case? 


Some technical things for a change if you do not mind:

You mention in some of your posts that the input DC current to the gate driver IC decreases as you place more and more RX coils around the TX coil. Would you tell why exactly the input current goes lower? 

A.king wrote this in Reply #334 on the role of the gate driver, I quote it here:
"The innovation by Rick is in the gate driver, because it causes a more disruptive discharge.  The disruptive discharge is  something which Tesla championed.  In this case it produces a larger magnetic field.
The difference is without the gate driver and  with the  frequency generator that has 20V PP you only get 250V PP on the transmitter coil, but 1300V with the gate driver @ 9V. So the gate driver dramatically increases the gains because of the fast rate of change.
This happens at  resonance of course, and you can see the increase on the scope shots.
The purpose of the disruptive discharge is to increase the rate of change." 

My question to you would be: what exactly insures a larger EM field coming out from the TX coil when a gate driver is used? Do you agree with A.king's explanations?  Anything else to add?

Gyula

[gyulasun]

Thanks for the answers.  Rick blames me not being scientific and whenever I ask for scientific results I am refused.
Why is that ?

By the way, this is an open forum.  I did not know about giving information for money is the habit for you.

Gyula

I did not use any equipment to check the readings. I mention the effect because you cannot prove anything over the internet. It is for others to repeat the experiment and comment.  I am happy it went cold. So replicate it if you can.  That's my message.
I gave the information for free.  I did not have to. Simple as that.

[a.king21]

Thanks for the answers.  Rick blames me not being scientific and whenever I ask for scientific results I am refused.
Why is that ?

By the way, this is an open forum.  I did not know about giving information for money is the habit for you.

Gyula

There you go twisting my words. I do not charge for information. I think you have some issues, or you are being paid to impune free energy research.