Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[rickfriedrich]

Nice red herring fallacy.

Good grief.

[lancaIV]

Rick Friedrich, make it better and clearer :
http://www.rexresearch.com/benitezbattycharg/benitez.html
" ...  Bedini revealed himself to not do proper and sufficient experiments..... "
".. Patrick Kelly's Free Energy book also misleads you... "

"battery killer" :calculating with conventional battery lifetime each produced/stored KWh is in the minimum15 -25 US$cents range,shortening the battery lifetime 1/3- up to 1/2 - makes the costs higher !

"FREE ENERGY WILL HELP TO HEAL THE WORLD" ,
                                              30 UScents/KWh "FREE ENERGY" ?

CO2- neutral 50% efficiency gen-sets produce, recycleable fuel !, in the 15 US$cents range.
With the israelitan inventor David Judbarovski his hydrogen concept 50% eff. gen-sets produce n the 5- 10 US$cents range !Dr.Pavel Imris static capacitive windings dynamo in the < 5 US$cents/KWh !

[ramset]

Rick when this topic hit the forum..it had nothing to do with batteries AKing told us you had soosed ? or sorted Don Smith...and kapenadze
etc etc ?maybe even the TPU..?
this was the secret to all these devices? nothing at all about needing batteries [was my impression]

plenty here have done battery swapping experiments .could never see a Magic gain when hooked up to appropriate equipment ?
that being said ,yes it is easy to juggle batteries ...let them rest and work within battery friendly load conditions and not have to charge them as much .
..one member commented that this cycling of batteries was an old Ham radio trick from many years ago.  ...So we buy more batteries to run big loads ?
how many to run a 1KW load ?[continuous ??}
since now its about the batteries ..
I think most here were not too interested since you had said you no longer do these ?  you found a solid state method to harvest energy?
Don't think for one second that any builder here when presented with an experiment would not perform the experiment.And no one here is suppressing these experiments except You.
lighting fires around others to distract from the problem [lack of an experiment]not good.
  I see it is hard to explain in an open source forum something which is not open sourced ...[no experiment to prove]
  Yes members are confused by this.. If we were having this discussion in Ricks factory We would understand getting thrown out for requesting proprietary information. here we are supposed to be open source friends not customers .
Open source an experiment and stand Back and watch what happens.100% transparent investigation for all to see ,Discuss, and replicate.
But you already know that..and as of this writing ...it has not happened.
   Here in the membership are persons who would save lives with this immediately !!and yet you type ........as if we discuss cake recipes ....or knitting techniques ....or point to others and type about suppression ??YEESH !!
Chet K

  Hopefully Stefan's friend can show something special !!and all the info to replicate .

[citfta]

Assuming each red led is at 2 volts and 20ma = 40 mw consumption per red led = 0.04 watts.
Therefore 25  red leds = 1 watt consumption. We have over 50 of these so we have to add a further 2 watts output to our calculations in addition to the 1/2 watt lit mr16s. (he he)

I only see 11 leds being lit.  I agree there are probably 50 coils but most of them don't seem to be connected to anything.  So the claim of lighting 50 leds doesn't seem to be correct.
Carroll

[lancaIV]

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.labsphere.com/site/assets/files/2570/the-radiometry-of-light-emitting-diodes-leds.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwi97YKEjN_jAhWnxIUKHRqhB3AQFggQMAA&usg=AOvVaw0hdJdpgSoCQnk5SqzH6I8N
linear versus progressive :
viewing angle 60°/30° : 4 times the power

We can do experiments -at first- for a better private household " light generator" ! Beginning with small steps. !