Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[lancaIV]

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305636853_Tesla's_nonlinear_oscillator-shuttle-circuit_OSC_theory_compared_with_linear_nonlinear-feedback_and_nonlinear-element_electrical_engineering_circuit_theory
Fazit : there is a need to measure and calculate : Joule/ cycle

[partzman]

GROUNDS FOR ELECTRICAL OVER UNITY RESEARCH:

"The conventional Maxwell theory is a classical linear theory in which the scalar and vector potentials appear to be arbitrary and defined by boundary conditions and choice of gauge. The conventional wisdom in engineering is that potentials have only mathematical, not physical, significance. However, besides the case of quantum theory, in which it is well known that the potentials are physical constructs, there are a number of physical phenomena—both classical and quantum-mechanical—which indicate that the Aµ fields, µ=0,1,2,3, do possess physical significance as global-to-local operators or gauge fields, in precisely constrained topologies." Barrett 2008, Topological Foundations of Electromagnetism.

2. "Tesla's approach to electrical engineering addresses primarily the reactive part of electromagnetic field-matter interactions, rather than the resistive part. His approach is more comparable with the physics of nonlinear optics and many-body systems than with that of single body systems. It is fundamentally a nonlinear approach and may be contrasted with the approach of mainstream electrical engineering, both linear and nonlinear. The nonlinear aspects of mainstream EE are based on feedback in the resistive field, whereas the nonlinearity in Tesla's approach is based on oscillators using to-and-fro shuttling of energy to capacitive stores through non-circuit elements attached to circuits. These oscillator-shuttle-circuit connections result in adiabatic nonlinearities in the complete oscillator-shuttle-circuit systems (OSCs). As a development of this approach, 3-wave, 4-wave...n-wave mixing is proposed here using OSC devices rather than laser-matter interactions. The interactions of oscillator-shuttles (OS) and circuits (C) to which they are attached as monopoles forming OSCs are not describable by Kirchhoff's and Ohm's laws. It is suggested that in the OSC formulation, floating grounds are functionally independent and do not function as common grounds. Tesla employed, rather, a concept of multiple grounds for energy storage and removal by oscillator-shuttles which cannot be fitted in the simple monolithic circuit format, permitting a many-body definition of the internal activity of device subsystems which act at different phase relations. This concept is the basis for his polyphase system of energy transfer. The Tesla OSCs are analogs of quaternionic systems.... It is shown that Tesla's OSC approach is more appropriately (succinctly) described in A four potential form, than in E, H, B and D field form or by Ohm's law. That is, the boundary conditions are of crucial importance in defining the functioning of OSCs." Tesla's nonlinear oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC) theory. By T. W. Barrett. 1991. Compared with linear, nonlinear-feedback and nonlinear-element electrical engineering circuit theory.

IMPLICATION:
All reasoning and metering that limits all circuitry or systems to such "resistive," "singular" or "linear theory" is arbitrary, circular, immature and unscientific. This is the substance of most disproof claims on this thread. My responses have exposed this as such.

And exactly where does Barrett specify that the Tesla OSC's are OU?

Pm

[TinselKoala]

Isn't it amazing? The most amazing property of Rick's OU is that it can tell the difference between test equipment with calibrated loads, and random fans, batteries and LEDs! The random fans, batteries and LEDs all show OU according to him, but the test equipment doesn't and actually _cannot_, apparently.

But can Rick actually power his Frequency Generator from the output of one or several receiver coils, as he himself said in one of his videos? Or is he too busy running away from Red Herrings?

[rickfriedrich]

Ok Red! I'm running! 

Isn't it amazing? The most amazing property of Rick's OU is that it can tell the difference between test equipment with calibrated loads, and random fans, batteries and LEDs! The random fans, batteries and LEDs all show OU according to him, but the test equipment doesn't and actually _cannot_, apparently.

But can Rick actually power his Frequency Generator from the output of one or several receiver coils, as he himself said in one of his videos? Or is he too busy running away from Red Herrings?

[nelsonrochaa]

Ok Red! I'm running! 

The best I've heard lately on this topic.